My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TIBBETSON_2_
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TIBBETSON_2_
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:54:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
If I can direct your attention to the location map. This is a continued hearing, but I’d like to <br />refresh the memories of the Planning Commission, and just give you some details on this <br />application. The location of this application is within the South Kona District of Hawaii. More <br />specifically we are looking at Mamalahoa Highway – Highway 11 – running in a north-south <br />direction. This area identified in this location is the Kona Paradise Subdivision; you might be <br />familiar with the Kaohe Road. Just to the south of the entrance to the subdivision is the location <br />of this application identified in a blue dot. Access is directly off Old Mamalahoa Highway. The <br />applicant in this case, Daniel Ibbetson, is requesting a bed and breakfast operation for two units. <br />Referring to the site plan that has been submitted by the applicant, this shows the property which <br />is identified as 0.722 acres or just less than 1 acre. Access to the highway is via this way to the -, <br />this will be to the east. This area on this side of the driveway would be bordering Kona Paradise <br />Subdivision. This is the existing floor plan for the dwelling that is on site. We have identified <br />the two bedrooms in color: B&B Bedroom No. 1 and Bedroom No. 2. There is a third bedroom <br />in which the owner would reside. Additionally there is a deck area and a pool. <br />After finalizing this application, the Planning Department became aware that this property is also <br />used as a cemetery. There are two grave sites on the property identified as Grave Site A and <br />Grave Site B. At the time this application was coming before the Planning Commission, the <br />Planning Department received a petition for standing in a contested case from Mr. Dean Kaiawe. <br />Although Mr. Kaiawe does not reside within 500 feet of the application, he believed his interests <br />were distinguishable from the general public in that his relatives are buried within Grave Site B. <br />The Planning Commission voted to grant standing to Mr. Kaiawe, and also voted to conduct the <br />th <br />contested case hearing, which was conducted on November 18 of 2005, and additionally on <br />thth <br />January 20 of 2006. On January 20 of 2006, the Planning Commission voted to deny the <br />application for a bed and breakfast operation. The applicant, Mr. Daniel Ibbetson, had filed an <br />appeal to the Third Circuit Court in a timely manner, and that is why we are here today. This is a <br />continued hearing to review and discuss the Third Circuit Court’s order reversing the decision of <br />the Planning Commission, and remanding the case back to the agency for further proceedings. <br />Are there any questions? <br />GRAHAM: Commissioners? Thank you, Jeff. Since this does cut all the way <br />back to last year and I know all the Commissioners were not here at that time, I’d like to first just <br />affirm, if you all could let me know, that you in fact do have the complete record from the <br />proceedings we held on this matter, and you’ve had an opportunity and have reviewed the <br />record. Is that true? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Yes. <br />GRAHAM: All right. Thank you all. I see affirmative nods from all of the six <br />Commissioners plus myself here today. The question becomes, this has been remanded to us by <br />the Circuit Court, so it’s back in our hands for our consideration. Procedurally how we go <br />forward from now is something that I think we need to work out with the intervenor and the <br />applicant on this. So I think probably it’s appropriate for them to come forward at this time, if <br />you would, and your representatives. Okay. First off, I’d like to swear you in. Do the four of <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter today before the Hawaii County Planning <br />Commission? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.