My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 Tumphrey
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 Tumphrey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:55:48 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:55:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There are several conditions to mention. Condition E, it states that the effective date of this <br />ordinance shall be either the completion and the opening of Mamalahoa Highway Bypass Road <br />to Napoopoo Junction or the completion of Mamalahoa Highway improvements along the <br />subject frontage, including a continuous two-way left turn lane, whichever occurs first. Until <br />one or the other of these actions occur, the zoning will remain in RS-7.5. Condition F requires <br />that, because this property is being proposed for Commercial uses, if a use such as a convenience <br />store is proposed for this property that a TIAR be submitted to the Department of Public Works. <br />We have sent out a revised list of conditions. On there you will find revisions to Conditions F, <br />H, and I. <br />This morning weve received several letters; and one of them is from Gerry Herbert and Nancy <br />Redfeather and another letter is from Janice Bovard. Those should be with the Commissioners at <br />this time. We have received letters previously before this hearing as well. <br />The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission send a favorable <br />recommendationtotheHawaiiCountyCouncil.Arethereanyquestions? <br />ALAMEDA:Questions,FellowCommissioners?CommissionerGraham? <br />GRAHAM:Justonequickquestion.Jeff,IjustmadeanotewhenIwasreadingthis <br />stuff the other day about what you just spoke of as a TIAR may be required under certain set of <br />circumstances. I didnt notice anything in there like it has to be done before this or that, or <br />anything like that. Is that something that was omitted, or not necessary, or -? <br />DARROW:It appears that theres no timeframe. If the applicants, assigns or <br />successors propose to put a convenience store on this property, it would trigger the requirement <br />of a TIAR. <br />GRAHAM:So then the TIAR would need to be done before the Planning Department <br />gives final approval for it? <br />DARROW:I see your point there. <br />GRAHAM:And it also doesnt speak to what the TIAR says as to what might be <br />required or anything. So it just seemed a little floating to me. <br />ALAMEDA:Good point. Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW:Mr. Director, would you want to add in something requiring a timeframe, <br />such as prior to plan approval, Condition F? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Im sorry. What is the date on the latest recommendation? <br />DARROW:It should be a yellow copy. The date is May 22, 2006. <br />2EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.