Laserfiche WebLink
front that€s a big mitigating addition that will help with the traffic, so we couldgoforward with <br />this at this time and make it contingent on that. But we really also have no way of knowing <br />when those conditions might be met, like when this other highway may bebuilt. So if, in fact, <br />we took up this rezoning at some point in the future, let€s say four years from now, then there€s a <br />whole set of circumstances and traffic and all that that we can evaluate at that time and decide if, <br />in fact, that mitigation is sufficient. But we€re trying to make that decision now and we make <br />these highly contingent kind of rezoning decisions. So I€m inclined to follow Mr. Iwashita€s <br />lead and feel like it€s premature in that given the situation we€re in now and the traffic being <br />what it is it we can€t justify it in that situation; and that if the situation was different in the future, <br />we should deal with it in the future. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Commissioner Graham. Other discussion items? <br />Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:I€djustliketoreiterateCommissionerIwashita€sandCommissioner <br />Graham€s sentiments. I think my opinion is that by doing the rezoning this way it just raises the <br />speculative nature of this particular lot and it does nothing more than make it more valuable as <br />the bypass road becomes closer to completion. And if the intent is to provide services then, <br />again, like Commissioner Graham stated when the Bypass is in, the traffic patterns have settled, I <br />think that will be the more appropriate time to submit the application with the most current <br />information available to Commissioners if it would be, whomever that may be. But at that point <br />in time a more informed decision can be made, rather than speculating on what might be. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Commissioner Salavea. Motion was made on the table by <br />Commissioner Watanabe, seconded by Commissioner Galdones, in favor of this application. <br />Seeing no further discussion, staff? <br />DARROW:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Aye. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Aye. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:No. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:No. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:No. <br />DARROW:And Mr. Chairman? <br />5EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />