Laserfiche WebLink
especially wealthy people like to perch themselves up in commanding views and stuff like that. <br />So I€m not convinced that the 30 feet will not intercept a much larger portion of the ocean view <br />than what it shows in this sort of typical - So I€m wondering if there€s some way, assuming that <br />. <br />you all are certainly okay with the same concern I have, that it can be written into a condition so <br />that we don€t have some applicant trying to take advantage of what he can to be on top of the <br />world there. <br />ALAMEDA:Response? <br />MOOERS:You know, I€m clear with your intent. I€m just quite not sure how you <br />would write that condition and how it would be enforced. The property, and if we had maybe <br />larger topography maps, we could see slopes away from the highway. There are flatter areas but <br />there are not promontories, you know, along the property that would extend above, other than a <br />couple of spots right along the road that would be 150 feet of the road. So I€m not quite sure <br />how to answer that question. There€s not, for example, a ridge on the property that someone <br />would build on top of the ridge and become more noticeable than in other spots. It€s a pretty <br />gradual drop to the ocean. In fact, it actually slopes down and then it drops very abruptly near <br />the ocean. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham, given the topography, does that still concern you, <br />the 30-foot limit or -? <br />GRAHAM:Yeah, it does concern me. And I wish I had the foresight to come out this <br />morning to really look closely as I went by. We€re all looking at it from a mathematical point of <br />view. There is a certain elevation of the road, I don€t know what it is. Let€s say it€s 300 feet and <br />there is a certain distance to the shoreline. So you can draw a triangle and say that the shoreline <br />is so many degrees below the horizontal. So if everything was to be more degrees below the <br />horizontal map we wouldn€t see it intercepting the shoreline at all. So if we made some <br />condition that if the degrees were 11 degrees below the horizontal then no housetop should be <br />more than 8 degrees below the horizontal or something, that would feel like that would be very <br />workable. <br />MOOERS:From the roadway fronting this property, you cannot see the shoreline in <br />any area. The shoreline is not visible. The ocean is visible but it drops abruptly into the ocean. <br />So from the roadway you cannot see the shoreline at any spot along this property. <br />YUEN:We did go through some in discussions. And I€m concerned about the <br />same thing that you€re talking about, three things: the view of the horizon, the view to the ocean <br />and then the nonview to the shoreline. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />YUEN:Okay,theviewtothehorizonisessentiallyhorizontal. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />YUEN:Andtheelevationoftheroadisatabout140feet.I€mconfidentwith <br />theseconditionsyouwillnotblocktheviewtothehorizon;andthat€swhatthisdiagramalso <br />shows.Youwouldhavetobuildprettyclosetotheroad,thetallestbuildingclosertotheroadto <br />blockaviewtothehorizon.Allright?Youwill,thehouses,withthiscondition,willblockpart <br />oftheviewofthesea,potentially.WhatI€msayingisasshowninthisdiagram,itwillblock <br />part of the view to the sea. And what we€ve done, the condition we have to deal with that is just <br />to limit the height, which will limit how much of the view is blocked, depending on how close it <br />is to the ocean. <br />8 <br /> <br />