My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TSunstone
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TSunstone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:57:54 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:57:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Aye. <br />DARROW:The motion passes five to zero to grant standing to Malcolm and Virginia <br />Scott. <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners, now the question of outsourcing or hearing it <br />ourselves? Whats your pleasure? Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I would move to outsource this to a Hearings Officer. <br />GALDONES:Second. <br />ALAMEDA:Motion made by Commissioner Watanabe to outsource, seconded by <br />CommissionerGaldones.Discussion?Mr.Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Ijustwanttoclarify,istheintentiontoconsolidatethethree?Basically <br />youve got three parties who are asking for a Contested Case. Is it your intention to consolidate <br />all three into one Contested Case? <br />WATANABE: I assumed that. I didnt think of it any other way. I dont know about the <br />other Commissioners, but I assumed that it was just going to be one hearing. <br />TORIGOE:Under your Rule 4-15, you can consolidate requests for hearings which <br />may include two or more parties. And, so, I think just for the purposes of, you know, clarity, you <br />should make clear on the record whether that is your intention; and, also, Mr. Lim may have <br />some input on that. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Yeah, I also feel like if any of the Petitioners would prefer not to have it <br />consolidated, they could come forward and let us know now. <br />LIM:We would prefer that all matters be consolidated for hearing. Wed also <br />prefer that should the Scotts become difficult to contact, that we dont have to take extraordinary <br />measures to get them to participate in the scheduling of the hearings and those type of things. <br />Thank you very much. <br />ALAMEDA:Youre welcome. Okay. <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, you should check and see if theres any objection from the <br />Intervenors. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Is there any objections from the Intervenors about consolidation? <br />No? Seeing none, thank you. <br />WATANABE: So we need a separate motion for that? <br />18EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.