My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TSunstone
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TSunstone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:57:54 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:57:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Well, basically, that should be the first order of business when youre <br />taking up an application, when you receive a Request for Standing in a Contested Case. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />TORIGOE:And essentially youll be bringing up those who have applied, asking if <br />they have anything extra or anything to add to their application and, also, allowing the Applicant <br />to respond. And then you need to make a decision as to whether the Applicants meet any of <br />those four criteria that I mentioned from your Rule 4-7(b). <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. So were talking about the Applicant then the, or the Petitioners <br />first? <br />TORIGOE:IthinkyouwanttobringupthePetitionersandbasicallyallowthemone- <br />at-a-time to go through their petitions, see if they have anything to add, if there are any questions <br />to them regarding their standing, then allow the Applicant also to respond to that, and make a <br />decision on each one. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. So could I call, lets see, Malcolm and Virginia Scott? Are you <br />here today? <br />PUBLIC:Theyre not here. <br />ALAMEDA:How about James and Karen Grimp? <br />GRIMP:Im Karen Grimp. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. We should make a decision on Malcolm and Virginia Scott, well, <br />before moving ahead. Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:I just wanted to say one thing in addition to the background that was given <br />so far. Well, the question of the connector road between Alii Drive and the future Kahului- <br />Keauhou Parkway was determined in a planning decision that was made by the Countys <br />planning consultants for the highway, R.M. Towill, and it was established to be at Alii Lani. So <br />this would be the major intersection in this area between Royal Poinciana and where the <br />Parkway would cross the Kuakini Highway. Originally, Sunstone did come up with a proposal <br />that it be relocated to the adjacent, to Alii Park Place, but the County said that we wanted to stick <br />with a decision that had been made previously to have it next to Alii Lani. This design has been <br />posted on the Countys website since 2001 or 2002. The connector road would be next to Alii <br />Lani. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: So, for clarification, then youre saying that were back to the original <br />plan, basically? <br />5EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.