My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_01_17 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023_01_17 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 11:01:34 AM
Creation date
2/22/2023 11:01:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />AG: Cause if we open up that legal lane to where we can sell wild animals we going get this influx of <br />mainlanders coming over here and catching all our animals just for sale – cause that’s what <br />happened to the guy on Maui – Maui Nui Venison. Those guys is just killing everything and <br />selling ‘em all over the whole world and they taking food out of people’s mouths, I mean, and <br />then they get the contract for hunt one certain area that many people used to be able to go <br />hunt and then since they got the contract, now the homeowner’s getting paid money so those <br />guys cannot go hunt there anymore because they not gonna pay. That’s definitely one big issue. <br /> <br />AA: Move to Natalie real quick cause we got like half an hour more and we still get couple more <br />things so Natalie… I see you Dexter, hold on. <br /> <br />NR: Natalie, District – 7, I just wanted to say was it re-evaluate every five years for the population? <br /> <br />SW: Yeah. <br /> <br />NR: I don’t agree with that – I think it should be re-evaluated every year by a biologist because five <br />years is too expensive. <br /> <br />LT: Leomana, District – 3. I don’t agree – I kinda agree with what you’re saying it should be re- <br />evaluated – I don’t agree with the biologist part – the biologist they don’t – I’d rather have <br />Austin over here \[unclear\] biologist don’t really know anything about the land and the animals. <br />But I agree that it should be sooner than five years because the natural cycles is of animals – <br />they react than five years – the migration of animals across our lands happen in days and lands <br />and private properties they put up fences everyday – they’ve fenced off all of the mountains <br />within a couple of months and so I agree they shouldn’t take five years to look over these plans <br />cause in two years… <br />‘ <br />AA: Two years should be sufficient… <br /> <br />LT: Two years could be sufficient enough I think because the \[unclear\] rates of all of our wild game, <br />you know, the pigs repopulate the fastest and I guess according to the wild – the pig experts – <br />we should go according to how the pigs repopulate in the wild. <br /> <br />AG: Austin, District – 6, here… The thing with the animals is their migration is lunar so it happens <br />same month, same time every year, so one month you could have a thousand animals inside this <br />unit and the next month there could be five animals in this unit. So if they’re fencing off the <br />areas, which they are, then they cannot migrate – the migrational pattern gets messed up. Some <br />of the private properties that I used to get to hunt before – that border national park got fenced <br />off so now the animals cannot come in there – they got trapped in that area – killed off – so it’s <br />definitely lunar, it should be every two years at the minimum, I think, so we can off balance that <br />one-year rotation to see what new animals are coming into the area. <br /> <br />NR: \[Unclear\] two years \[unclear\] too much and I think that’s \[unclear\]. <br /> <br />AA: Yeah, go ahead Dexter. <br /> <br />SW: Oh, sorry… <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.