Laserfiche WebLink
In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26(2)(A), the <br /> proposed development will not have any significant adverse environmental or <br /> ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable <br /> and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interest. <br /> In considering the significance of potential environmental effects,the Director shall <br /> consider the sum of those effects that adversely affect the quality of the environment and <br /> shall evaluate the overall and cumulative effects of the action on the Special Management <br /> Area. Such adverse effects shall include, but not be limited to, the potential cumulative <br /> impact of individual developments, each one of which taken in itself might not have a <br /> substantial adverse effect and eliminate planning options. <br /> The proposed single-family residence is a replacement of a dwelling that has been <br /> on the property for over 60 years. Demolishing the existing dwelling provides the applicant <br /> the ability to rebuild the home outside the current 40-foot shoreline setback area in what <br /> could be considered a minor implementation of managed retreat which is an acceptable <br /> planning practice for coastal development on small parcels. The existing dwelling was built <br /> within 20 feet of the shoreline due to its age and construction prior to SMA law and as such <br /> does not follow current law regarding the proper siting of shoreline development. The <br /> property is bounded on the shoreline by a legal seawall confirmed to be intact and unaltered <br /> since it was reconstructed (legally) in 2012. The property is bounded by a large wooden <br /> fence to the south and the County owned and maintained pedestrian shoreline access path <br /> directly north of the subject parcel. Based on the above factors the proposed project will <br /> not significantly alter or impact coastal resources nor impact access to and along the <br /> shoreline. <br /> The subject parcel has been used for over 60 years as a residential property within <br /> a well-established residential community therefore the land has been altered by historic <br /> land disturbance common to residential development. The property has also been fully <br /> landscaped for decades; therefore, it is not anticipated that any rare or endangered floral or <br /> faunal species would be found on the parcel, nor would any be affected by the proposed <br /> project. A home on this property would have no adverse effect on natural beauty and scenic <br /> view planes since it is a replacement of a similar structure that has been existing for decades <br /> and is within a community of similar developmental character and use. Based on the small <br /> 3 <br />