Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Who are you asking? <br />IWASHITA:I don€t know. Whoever knows the answer? <br />YUEN:We had a letter in the file from the State that, where the State claims <br />ownership and fee of the Judd Trail by virtue of the Highways Act of 1892. What they€re saying <br />is there are portions of the Judd Trail that are physically in existence on the ground and can be <br />verified. There are maps that show the Judd Trail without enough detail to physically locate it on <br />the ground. And what they€re saying is there are portions where it has been obliterated, where <br />the physical description of it has been obliterated; and I believe there is no legal description of it. <br />We would be able to say that somewhere on mauka properties in an approximate location there <br />was a Judd Trail, but that you actually can€t show it on the ground in certain locations. In this <br />portion of the property, very close to Alii Drive, though, you can. <br />IWASHITA:Well, you know, my concern is about the extent of this survey. Because in <br />mymindwhattheyshouldsay,andIdon€tknowifitdoes,isthatthemetesandboundssurvey <br />should include the portion of the Judd Trail from Alii Drive to the mauka boundary of this <br />property, wherever it may be located, whether on this property or adjoining, you know. But it <br />should follow, you know, the surveyor should be able to determine to the extent physically <br />possible; and by agreement with the owners in the end if, you know, there€s no real physical <br />evidence to establish the location -. But there should be a clear understanding of the developer in <br />this case that, in fact, at the end of this process, there€s going to be a survey of metes and bounds, <br />legal description of the Judd Trail from Alii Drive to the mauka boundary of this property. And <br />if that€s not the case then ƒ. <br />MOORE:Presumably it extends off the property into the easement, you know, right <br />at the point where you see the walls ending on that map ƒ. <br />IWASHITA:I€m not presuming to do the surveyor€s job. The surveyor€s job is to <br />locate the, is to locate the Judd Trail. Because title to the Judd Trail is not disputed, right? The <br />State owns the Judd Trail. Is that, on that point, is there an agreement? <br />MOORE:Oh, yeah. <br />LAU:Yes. <br />IWASHITA:Okay. Nobody is disputing the title. This is a classic example of an <br />unlocated, in this case, right-of-way, a trail, right, an old road, roadway. And so the only issue <br />that needs to be addressed in this application to me is to make it real clear that what the surveyor <br />is doing is not surveying a hundred feet of wall that he can find but to place on the ground, right, <br />the extension of the Trail up to the mauka boundary of this property. I just want to make sure <br />that that€s the clear understanding of what€s going to be done here. <br />LAU:May I make a suggestion? <br />IWASHITA:I€d like an answer to that question first. <br />6EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />