My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:00:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
northern and southern, this is 2001. This is the latest engineering design from 2003. This <br />property right here owned by Mr. Robinson and his wife, Claire and Rick Robinson, has a flood <br />channel flowing right through it. The last major storm that we had, my husband and I who store <br />sand bags for our entire subdivision had to deliver, let Mr. Robinson come over and get about 33 <br />of our sand bags because he was flooding because of the flood channel. And if you will look at <br />the subdivision map there, approximately two-thirds of this piece of property is this new <br />subdivision, which Ill talk about in a minute. But please notice how much larger the flood <br />channels and the shape had to have changed as the mapping has gotten better from 1998 to 2003. <br />This map is from 2005. Its the subdivision preliminary map. Youll notice that this northern <br />flood channel is much smaller in size as its designed in here. And the plan is to channelize it <br />into this green section, the slope of the land runs 10 to 20 degrees. Theres no way that that little <br />green area is going to handle the flood waters coming through here; and the flood waters exceed <br />five cubic feet per second. It would scour this out and we will have a major soil runoff. This <br />whole pali up here that should be Important Agricultural land and is well within the Kona Coffee <br />Belthasdirt,reallydeepdirt.Wehavealotofa a,butwehaveplentyofdirt.Weregoingto <br />have a Hokulia mess taking place right here off of this pali again. <br />In addition, the subdivision has 36 significant cultural sites, only four of which are noted on the <br />subdivision map. This plat map has been designed to be in violation of the current SMA Permit <br />which requires all lots within the Conservation area here to be a minimum of three acres. <br />Theyre all two acres. Anybody in this subdivision beyond these to lots coming off of <br />Napo opo o Road are going to be trapped in here by flood waters. They will not be able to be <br />contained by that channel. <br />Now how this thing got into the Urban situation -. Many years ago in the mid-80s, the <br />Greenwell family owned the entire top of this pali, or most of it, most of it. And they wanted to <br />put in a hotel and a golf course; and they went to the State and they got it zoned to Urban so they <br />could do that. It should never have been zoned Urban. This is an Ag area. Any of you whove <br />ever driven down Napo opo o Road know what a dangerous two-lane, winding country road that <br />is. Theres no way capable of handling Urban traffic or High Density. This area is entirely in <br />the coffee belt. I think the pali starts 800 feet at the top of the pali; and then it rises up to about <br />1,300 feet, something in that neighborhood. <br />The problem with this is that going through a Rural designation is possibly the most dangerous <br />thing that we can do in this area because Rural allows you to go down to lots, I think, 9,000 <br />square feet. Thatll be five houses per acre, approximately five houses per acre. <br />The developer of the subdivision and the F-2 owns 90 percent of that F-2. He has been in <br />communication, in line with Mr. Yuen for the last two years to get this area designated as Rural. <br />Now any time you hear an attorney or developer sit here and say there are no plans to do x, be <br />sure that 5 seconds after the permit is granted, there will be plans to do x. And Mr. Norrie has <br />a long track record of doing this as he did in my subdivision. He owns all of these lots here at <br />the bottom section. He came before you, the Planning Commission, or the Council, or the <br />Planning Department and said, This piece of Conservation land is going to be my retirement <br />home. Now, you know you can have two acres around your house as your house lot. He went <br />before them and said, I need another 19 acres for that. Well, he didnt get it, at least I dont <br />believe he got it because the community went up in arms and said, No, you dont need 19 acres <br />for a house lot in a Conservation zone. So he has this, he wanted to build his retirement home. <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.