My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:00:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Okay. Any other comments, Fellow Commissioners? Commissioner <br />Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Asa follow-up to that comment, I think were not aware at this present <br />time but youre probably aware that there are other applications for special permits, right, in that <br />area. So would that influence some of this? <br />YUEN:We do get quite a few applications for special permits, there have been <br />quite a few over the years. And the idea behind having a designated area is really as a signal to <br />people where to go. Otherwise, they will tend to buy a lot, actually, one of the dominant patterns <br />is people buy a lot, they start the business, and they get busted, and then they apply for the <br />special permit -- Not really the way to go. So, at the same time, we understand why, you know, <br />you have a population center with the Paradise Park Subdivision which probably has more <br />peoplethanthetownofWaimeawithvirtuallynocommercialactivitycloserthanKeaauor <br />Pahoa towns which are, you know, seven miles away. <br />WATANABE: I would tend to agree. With that much opportunity there, I dont see how <br />youre going to hold back the development. Then without any kind of plan, then, I think were <br />going to wind up with some of the other things weve been concerned about, like that strip mall <br />on that main road going there; and those are some of the things weve been, you know, debating <br />over in the past. And I know weve turned down some projects that many of us thought maybe <br />would have been good but did not fit into the General Plan. So, I dont think that given as many <br />people as there are there, I dont think that you can say, but we dont have any plan yet, even <br />though we know youre going to need the services. With that in mind, I would tend to agree <br />with the Director. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Other thoughts before we move on to A-2? Commissioner <br />Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Chris, is this area still at State Land Use level, is it still Agriculture? <br />YUEN:Thats right. <br />GRAHAM:It would seem like, you know, looking at the long-term picture, if were <br />going to change some of this land to General Plan as you suggested it would be nice if the State <br />had an Urban designation so that if folks want to develop they can go in for rezonings which are <br />then appropriate to the General Plan. But at this point even if we change the General Plan <br />theyve got to go through the special permit process, it would seem, if they want to do <br />development. Is that correct? <br />YUEN:Well, no, people could rezone at the Council level with a 15-acre or less <br />boundary amendment. And although the pattern has been to do things like special permit, I think <br />long-range we would rather see that development happen through zoning. It would have a <br />boundary amendment and accompanied by a zone change in the future. <br />GRAHAM:And just one follow-up with regard to my prior question when I asked you <br />about the community association there. And in the letter we have on record they did suggest on <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.