2003-05-27 TBLASMAN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

(mauka) of Ali'i Drive in the vicinity of Hlualoa Bay and across of the Keolonhihi State Historical Park at Kamoa Point, Hlualoa 4, North Kona. Norman, do you want to, just for the record, go ahead and give us some specifics. HAYASHI:Okay. GIFFIN:In terms of the placement. HAYASHI:I think all of you are familiar with the subject property so, Madam Chair, if I may dispense with that. GIFFIN:Sure. HAYASHI:I'd just like to inform you that the hearing for today's th published in the, on April 25 in the Hawaii Tribune-Herald, West Hawaii Today, Honolulu Star Bulletin, The Garden Isle, and The Maui News, and the hearing notice was thth for May 27, 2003, and continuing on to May 28 and 29, if necessary. The starting time was published as 9:00 a.m., and also the place of the hearing was published as the Royal Kona Resort, Resolution Room, 75-5852 Ali`i Drive, Kailua-Kona, North Kona, Hawai`i. th By letter dated April 9, we also informed the parties of this meeting and the information was earlier provided to you. th On May 9, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 01-03, which is a resolution confirming the appointment of the Hearings Officers. M. ROY:Ms. Giffin? GIFFIN:You're welcome, Norman. Yes, Mikahala. M. ROY:Thank you. For the record, there has been great confusion regarding this reshifting of location for this public hearing, for this contested hearing. At th the last session, we announced that it would be held at the dates 27, 28, 29, and in the community it has been spread about that these would be the days. The location was shared to be at Ohana. Some of us didn't even, with the nature of the way the recordation happens with letters from the County, I wish that calls would be made to the parties because I wasn't aware of this, that I had received this notice. So, for the record, your procedures of letting public know changes are inefficient and insufficient. Thank you. GIFFIN:It is with regret that this confusion has occurred. Over the weekend, I did spend a lot of time reviewing the record of those last two meetings, and on Pages 78 and 79 of the minutes, although we do speak of the dates, it is not mentioned where. And I would like to be corrected if I am wrong, but the site was not stated on the record; the dates were, but not the place. M. ROY:Thank you. 2