My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (3)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:10:47 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:10:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
recommendations, they could prepare their recommendations and then adopt them in a noticed <br />st <br />meeting on the 1. ThatÓs what IÓm saying. <br />DAVID:And when would our proposed findings be due from the parties? <br />VITOUSEK:Well we would, we would submit, we would circulate proposed findings <br />before the hearing, and you would have the opportunity to submit whatever findings, additional <br />th <br />proposed findings you wanted before the hearing on the 28, during the hearing at anytime up <br />until the close of the hearing. <br />DAVID:But I still have a question. We would need to have -. I think we need to <br />prepare our findings and submit it at the same time that the continued contested case hearing is <br />being held. Is that what youÓre saying? <br />ISHADO:Madam Chair, may I suggest that, Mr. Tyler is here, perhaps at our next <br />break we could discuss this among the parties in terms of what the schedule should be like. <br />And -. <br />GIFFIN:Thank you, Mr. Ishado. I think that thatÓs a very good suggestion. And, <br />in fact, thatÓs what weÓll do, weÓll go ahead and take your witness, Mr. Tyler, now since he is <br />here. And then IÓll call for a recess when you can all get together and discuss whatever it is you <br />people want to do might be best. <br />Did you have another proposal Mikahala? <br />M. ROY:Will we be discussing with you then at recess or is this to be on record <br />when we discuss this matter? <br />GIFFIN:No, I think it would be best that it not be on record. You people can <br />discuss it during recess. <br />TORIGOE:Just to clarify, this would just be an opportunity for the parties to discuss <br />among themselves what might work in terms of a procedure to finalize and assist the panel in <br />finalizing a recommendation to the Planning Commission. And then whatever is decided, <br />obviously, youÓll come back and put it on record. <br />st <br />M. ROY:So youÓre suggesting that the Planning Commission hearing on August 1 <br />is the Commission hearing that youÓd like to make a recommendation on this case? <br />TORIGOE:I think what Mr. Vitousek was suggesting is that since weÓre having these <br />thth <br />evidentiary hearings on the 28 till the 30, that immediately at the end of that, you could have <br />your final argument. And after that, the panel could look over whatever proposed findings the <br />parties have provided, make up their own findings, whatever those are, in recommendations. <br />st <br />And then on August 1 the panel could meet and officially adopt the recommendation, and then <br />that would be transmitted to the Planning Commission. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.