Laserfiche WebLink
TORIGOE:I think thatÓs a good idea. And maybe if you can produce either an outline <br />or written testimony that you can share with the other parties at some agreed point beforehand, <br />so you can see if there are particular objectionable areas, you might be able to work it out. And, <br />if not, then it might be helpful if the objecting party would file a written request to limit or <br />exclude testimony before the hearing. But if thatÓs going to be done, then maybe we should ask <br />that that be done, what, two weeks before? <br />GIFFIN:Yes. <br />TORIGOE:If thatÓs okay. <br />DAVID:I just want to make another note. Mr. FormanÓs testimony <br />opinion, critical to the presentation of my case, because he has, he holds one part of my entire <br />presentation, not necessarily where -. I will try to demonstrate how the, I mean, how certain <br />situations in the past have happened. So thatÓs why heÓs a critical part of my presentation and <br />my case. <br />GIFFIN:Randy? <br />VITOUSEK:Yeah, I think the procedure that has been proposed by Commissioner <br />Springer and by Mr. Torigoe is very appropriate. I mean, you know, then Ms. David gets to <br />offer through the witnessÓ own proposed testimony what his testimony will be, how itÓs relevant <br />to the case. I have an opportunity to object to it before the hearing and, hopefully, we can save <br />time. That was the only point here. <br />GIFFIN:Maile and Randy, Mr. Torigoe has just suggested then that the proposed <br />testimony from your witness be available to him, to Randy, two weeks before, give Randy a <br />week to respond. <br />DAVID:Okay. <br />GIFFIN:Randy, is that comfortable? <br />VITOUSEK:ThatÓs fine. <br />GIFFIN:Great. Lester? <br />ISHADO:Madam Chair, is that going to be made available to all th <br />GIFFIN:Yeah. <br />ISHADO:Thank you. <br />GIFFIN:Anything else? <br />Mikahala, witnesses and your schedule, proposed schedule for July? <br />5 <br /> <br />