My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (3)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:10:47 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:10:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DAVID:Madam Chair, my estimate, time estimate for my witnesses w <br />counting cross or anything like that, would be about a half hour, not more than a half hour each. <br />GIFFIN:And Norman, I donÓt Î <br />DAVID:And thatÓs just an estimate. <br />GIFFIN:Norman, am I looking at two days, does that sound right to you? <br />HAYASHI:I think that would be a good estimate. <br />th <br />GIFFIN:Is the 29 a Tuesday, Norman? <br />th <br />HAYASHI:The 29 is a Tuesday. <br />GIFFIN:Then IÓm going to propose that we begin the continued hearing, the third <br />thth <br />series, on Tuesday the 29, and go through the 30 which is Wednesday. <br />HAYASHI:Okay, weÓll try to secure a facility for that then. The first preference, as <br />indicated by the Chair, would be to look at the Keauhou Ohana? <br />GIFFIN:Correct, for the hearing and sleeping. Maile? <br />DAVID:I have another question. When would closing arguments be worked into <br />this two-day schedule and are we having a time limitation on closing arguments, that sort of <br />thing? And then the CountyÓs case is still, IÓm not sure how long Mr. Ishado is going to take in <br />doing the CountyÓs case after Mikahala and I are done. So, thatÓs my question. <br />GIFFIN:Good question. Randy? <br />VITOUSEK:Madam Chair, in following up on my statements on Monday <br />reminded to me by my client, we would definitely prefer to set aside enough time to finish it in <br />this next set of hearing dates, absolutely. And so, you know, we do not, we do not want to get <br />into a situation where we underestimate the duration of the hearing and, therefore, have to incur <br />another two- or three-month delay in the process. So we would ask that we just go with the 28, <br />th <br />29, and 30 , and if we finish early, great; if we donÓt, we really want to finish on this next set of <br />hearing days. We really want to finish. <br />GIFFIN:Hannah? <br />SPRINGER:I agree with Mr. Vitousek; and that was the basis of my comments of the <br />timing earlier, that we be sure that weÓre allowing ourselves enough time to complete business to <br />the best of our ability, huki-pau in the next session. <br />th <br />GIFFIN:And Norman, maybe, we should look at the 28. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.