My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:10:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:10:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GIFFIN:Mr. Ishado? <br />ISHADO:We just had a technical question on the source. <br />GIFFIN:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Yes. I believe that, let me confirm this with Mr. Hayashi. <br />believe that we put this in the record, the Planning Department, before the Contested <br />Case Hearing. ItÓs part of the Planning DepartmentÓs file. <br />GIFFIN:In the Background Report? <br />YUEN:No, it is not. It was after the first hearing but before the Contested <br />Case Hearing. We were supposed to put it in the file. ItÓs supposed to be part of the <br />record for the Commissioners. We should have it introduced, no, I think it would be best <br />to introduce it now as an exhibit formally, though. Is it in the record? <br />HAYASHI:We have a copy of that map with your name on, ÐReturn to <br />Christopher Yuen.Ñ So I would assume thatÓs -. I donÓt know how we got that map. <br />YUEN:Yeah, I think one of the Intervenors furnished us with a copy and <br />that it was posted at the first hearing that we had on this, and that it should be, you know, <br />it should be already a part of the record. But I think for sake of clarity and for the sake of <br />the record that it should be introduced. And I also see that thereÓs a difference between <br />the map thatÓs currently being shown to the Commission and the map that we had posted <br />at our first public hearing that we had. <br />M. ROY:Of Keolonhihi? <br />YUEN:Yes. This map is only of Keakealaniwahine. So we really should <br />introduce this map as an exhibit here, this map of Keolonhihi. <br />ISHADO:Thank you, Madam Chair. <br />M. ROY:Thank you. <br />GIFFIN:Mikahala, as Commissioner Springer has just pointed out to me on <br />your exhibit list, you have as No. 2, ÐAll maps by Henry Kekahun <br />M. ROY:Correct, yes. And in accord with what Mr. Yuen has said, they <br />were presented at that public opportunity, perhaps all of those Kekahuna maps; but if I <br />may be incorrect with saying that as well that this was not so. I mean to say by all these <br />exhibits that we want to enter for certainty, all the maps related to this area by Kekahuna. <br />GIFFIN:So then, wouldnÓt that suffice, Mr. Torigoe, or do we have to <br />specifically say -? <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.