2004-05-28 TNAKAKURA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WONG:Mr. Chairman, can you repeat that again? I don’t follow you on this. FUJIKAWA:You have any objections to the exhibits? WONG:The objections, the objection to the exhibit would be the facilities that is located on the property. So would that be part of the exhibit that you’re talking about? FUJIKAWA:Any of the exhibits, do you have any objections to it? TORIGOE:Let me clarify. Just, Mr. Wong, basically, the Chairperson is trying to make sure for the record that we have these exhibits either admitted or not, as evidence for the contested case. So if you have a problem with, you know, the Commission even considering this matter then you should express that now. For instance, if you feel that the exhibits are just completely relevant, or any part of them are completely irrelevant, or if you feel that they’re not accurate, you shouldn’t be considering, you should not even be considering them at all. It’s not whether you agree with what they’re saying, it’s just whether you think there’s any fundamental problem with the Commission even looking at these things. WONG:Well, the only objection that I have would be how to, could I have a little short break here while I talk to my cousin here? FUJIKAWA:Yeah, let’s take five-minute break. RECESSEDThe Chair called a short recess at 9:31 a.m. RECONVENEDThe meeting reconvened at 9:36 a.m. FUJIKAWA:Will the Planning Commission meeting please continue. Mr. Wong, you were on the, you were doing the testimony right now. WONG:Yes, Mr. Chairman. FUJIKAWA:Go ahead. WONG:Yes. Mr. Chairman, for the record, the thing that we want to object to is the area where they talked about the value and the, I’m sorry, the cultural, historical, natural resources that they talked -. FUJIKAWA:What page are you on? WONG:Oh, I’m sorry, page No. 3. FUJIKAWA:Okay. Now this is the statement from the applicant, right? 11