My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-06-02 THirayama
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-06-02 THirayama
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:21:44 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:21:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Follow-up for the Director. Would it be appropriate at this time to make <br />some of these revisions, such as the 5400 square feet, you know, revising that from the 7200 <br />square feet, and also possibly crafting an additional condition for the height limitation to the <br />existing zoning to reflect 35 feet? <br />YUEN: The height limitation whenever the Commission is ready to make a <br />motion, that could be included as a new amendment, a new numbered condition. The square <br />footage is not actually in the conditions or in the ordinance itself. It’s just their presenting a <br />concept; and typically the applicants will have some kind of concept that they bring. But unless <br />there are special conditions of zoning attached to the ordinance, the concept can change. And so, <br />for example here, they presented a concept of a 7200-square foot building, that doesn’t mean that <br />they can even get a 7200 -. I just pointed it out that it looked to me like the parking wasn’t going <br />to work for that size of building. But I also have to mention to the Commission not to get, to <br />always keep in mind that when you make a rezoning, particularly to a Commercial rezoning like <br />this, you’re rezoning it; and unless you say you must build no more than 5,000 square feet, which <br />has been done in special circumstances, that there’s a lot of things that can happen. They can <br />make a multi-family building here, you know, they can make an apartment building. How many <br />square feet we got on the site? <br />FUKE:It’s roughly about 22,000 square feet. <br />YUEN:You can make a 16-unit apartment building, for example, with the CN <br />zoning, three-story walk-up apartment building. Example, you can make an office building. <br />They’re presenting a building that will be divided into several bays. You can make a building <br />that has only one tenant. <br />WATANABE:So we should view this more as an entitlement issue than site specific as <br />far as the proposed plan? <br />YUEN:Right. Unless you’re going to put in special conditions of zoning that <br />greatly limit the uses the Commission should always look at these as something that is being <br />zoned to CN and the five years from now could result in a project that is quite different than <br />what is being presented as a current concept. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Any other questions? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:I just wanted to address the comments made by Mr. Fuke about how the <br />Community Development Plan works with the General Plan, and which is really the basis for my <br />opposition, one of the basis; and that is the General Plan includes 15.1, Community <br />Development Plan, as part of the plan implementation. And this is the law. It states a <br />6EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.