My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-06-04 T-COUNCIL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-06-04 T-COUNCIL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:26:31 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:26:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KERN: Right. And so if we support the letter, that in turn actually is supporting, that is kind of <br />giving it a favorable recommendation to all of 194? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Pretty much. <br />KERN: Pretty much, yeah. Okay. <br />WOODWARD: Any other questions? <br />KERN: IÓm just kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place with this one. ThereÓs a lot of <br />beef there. I was part of the CDP process early on. I disagreed with a lot of parts of it, I agreed <br />with a lot of other parts of it. IÓm glad to see that the folks we had some disagreement with at <br />times are at least showing up and trying to push the whole process through. I would personally <br />like to see it come in a little bit more piecemeal. ItÓs a lot of information in one bill, myself. <br />IÓm just going to throw that out there. IÓm not making any moti <br />WOODWARD: All right. Let me ask the Planning Director, what was the genesis of this bill in <br />the first place that they decided that they had to have one all encompassing bill to have 83 <br />different amendments? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I donÓt know what the genesis of the bill, other the fact that Council <br />Chair Yoshimoto felt that certain amount of time had lapsed from 2008, and he thought that the <br />better way to do it was in one comprehensive bill. Because then itÓs one cohesive document as <br />opposed to multiple different ones, and then youÓre trying to see, you know, what changes. So <br />my understanding is he kind of went through what had been proposed earlier and tried to <br />incorporate it into one bill. But it is what it is. ItÓs the way it came from the County Council. It <br />didnÓt come piecemeal. And so you have to make your recommendat <br />front of you. <br />What IÓm choosing to do with the other recommendations that came <br />is I will introduce separate amendments to implement the differe <br />rather than throwing all of them into one bill. But that, you know, is going to be my decision in <br />terms of how I initiate it. But Bill 194 is what it is. It came to us from the Council; and thatÓs <br />you either go pretty much up or down on it or make your recommen those sections that <br />you donÓt like or those sections that you do like. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. Any further questions? Well, I have one other further, one other <br />question. And that is apart from the genesis who, where did the input come from to get this bill? <br />I mean who crafted it. Obviously Councilmen didnÓt. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Actually the Council Member staff put it together. The table that compares <br />the different provisions was voluntarily done by Steve Lim. It came forward because he thought <br />it was difficult to understand without having kind of a table that showed you where the <br />14 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.