Laserfiche WebLink
WOODWARD: Okay. Do we have a second for that? <br />AU: Second. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. Discussion? Of course, if we end up with a split vote itÓs deferred <br />anyway. So -. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: No. <br />WOODWARD: No? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: It goes up with a -. <br />WOODWARD: Negative? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Negative. <br />WOODWARD: Oh, does it? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: yes. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. All right. So discussion? <br />ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />WOODWARD: Yes. <br />ISHIBASHI: Well, I believe the Council already went through this with a fine tooth comb and <br />theyÓre coming back with a recommendation to us to, you know, make changes where we see <br />appropriate. So, yeah, I can understand putting everything in one basket, and there are a lot of <br />issues in the basket that are not to the likings of the community. But I think the Council already <br />is sending it back to us for our input and see where we go from there. So thatÓs why IÓm in favor <br />of the Planning DirectorÓs recommendation. <br />WOODWARD: Any other discussion? Well, IÓll put in my two cents worth. I have a few <br />concerns about this bill. One is why is it an emergency? And why are we forced into an <br />arbitrary time limit? Who is it that actually put this together and why doesnÓt the community <br />support it, and people who put together the CDP in the first place? I havenÓt had good answers <br />to any of those questions to be honest with you. You know, the law says that within ten years <br />they have to address amending the CDP. It has only been two. And now weÓre dealing with this <br />mish-mesh of unrelated 83 amendments. The whole thing is longer than the original CDP that <br />we have to act on immediately. And it just doesnÓt feel right, smell right. And IÓm not really <br />sure what I would be voting for if I was voting for it. So IÓm afraid I canÓt support it. ThatÓs my <br />two cents worth. Anybody else? Okay, letÓs take a vote. <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />