Laserfiche WebLink
We are still a little bit uncomfortable with something that the Planning Director referred to a few <br />minutes ago about the kind of language that Bill 94 would use to tweak the, subtly tweak the <br />intent of the community plan. We need some help on this. Our co <br />idea of community driven and action committees is kind of a new concept. And we might be <br />wrong on this, but weÓre not real comfortable with these conditional syntax thatÓs been inserted <br />into the plan that causes the plan to propose things or to consider things. We see it as an action <br />plan; and weÓd prefer to see the action words remain. We understand that we as a steering <br />committee, is an action committee, are responsible to the Planning Director. We communicate to <br />you and we support you in what youÓre doing; and we communicate to you the intent of the <br />community. But, correct us if weÓre wrong, we think youÓre the implementor of this plan. And <br />weÓre wondering if youÓre not, who is? YouÓre part of the executive department of County <br />government, and the County Council is part of the legislative branch. So who would be the <br />implementing authority? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I see myself as working on implementing the plan, which is why I felt that <br />words like Ðpropose amendmentsÑ were more consistent with my role, because I donÓt amend. <br />You know, the County Council amends it through legislative actio <br />know, what I viewed my role as, like one of the things that you referenced here is, you know, <br />getting the County Building Code amended to add standards for traditional Hawaiian building <br />design and construction methods. So in my role what I did is I went and got the design standards <br />that had been adopted by Maui County, and sent them to the Building Division and to Warren <br />Lee asking that they be incorporated into the Building Code. They responded that they have that <br />appropriate language drafted and when they go to the County Council with the new Building <br />Code that language will be part of the new Building Code. And s <br />them, cause I saw that as my role. The actual proposal to amend it will not come from me. The <br />actual proposal will come from the Building Division. So what I did is I proposed those <br />amendments to them; and theyÓve responded that theyÓre going to incorporate it in the next <br />Building Code that goes to the Council, cause they want to do a comprehensive update. <br />I also, you know, am doing what I can to initiate amendments. Staff has already been directed to <br />draft those other amendments that the Action Committee recommend <br />what IÓm going to be doing, IÓm going to be proposing them and starting the process. But itÓs <br />going to be up to the County Council where they ultimately approve it or not, and thereby amend <br />the CDP. And so I think maybe itÓs my view of what I can or cannot do versus what the Council <br />does; and I saw this more as a plan that IÓm supposed to impleme <br />implementing it and proposing the amendments as opposed to I canÓt amend and my Department <br />canÓt amend them, and for that matter not even the Planning Commission can amend it. <br />Ultimately itÓs the County Council. <br />TAYLOR: ThatÓs great. And our interest as the Action Committee is what the action says, is to <br />get action going on this plan. And if this is your approach we greatly respect that and will <br />support you in that. We just want to be sure this plan doesnÓt get mired down in a mass of <br />procedures and become sidetracked over things like that. So thank you for your clarification. <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />