My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-06-04 T-MALOOF
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-06-04 T-MALOOF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:26:40 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:26:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Advisory Committee for the planning of the KeaÒau Bypass, the planning for the widening of <br />Highway 130 in the early nineties for the, representing them on the Long Range Surface <br />Transportation Plan for the State in the mid nineties. And I am on the current community <br />advisory committee for the present plan for widening Highway 130. I know an awful lot about <br />traffic in Puna. <br />I have read the objections of the Planning Department; and a little bit of information is a <br />dangerous thing. I will grant you that Highway 130 is a mess. And the Traffic Committee, in <br />fact, told the State that it was going to be a mess when they did it, weÓre on record. And, in fact, <br />we filed on the Long Range Surface Transportation Plan a civil rights complaint over that, a <br />successful civil rights complaint over that. <br />More relevant to this, in the work on the current widening process, one of the understandings that <br />we came to very early on in that process was that no amount of work on Highway 130 is going to <br />fix it. That is not possible at this time in any future that anybody in this room can foresee, <br />including her. ThereÓs 40,000 plus vacant lots in Puna. In March of this year Puna led the State <br />in home sales. ThatÓs over Oahu that has 11 times the population. It was agreed in our planning <br />process on the State Highway issue and on the Puna CDP, which I chaired, I think most of you <br />know that, that no amount of road building was going to fix the process. The only thing we <br />could do was to designate commercial areas and bring the jobs and the services into the <br />communities. I hear what Taka says, but that boat has sailed. T <br />methodology that applies anymore. In a normal system you would approve the lots based on the <br />infrastructure. Well, thatÓs not going to happen. The lots are already out there, theyÓre in private <br />hands. <br />So we put those commercial centers and those other services into the subdivisions with the <br />advice and consent of the subdivisions, in this case Orchidland. ItÓs there because thatÓs what <br />they asked for. And what they asked for was reasonable in terms of the size, the number of lots <br />in the subdivision; and itÓs not intended to serve all of Puna, just as has been pointed out. The <br />intention of that is to serve the people in Orchidland. Now the fact of the matter is that the <br />majority of the accidents that occur on Highway 130 are people turning left out of Orchidland <br />headed toward Hilo. Now guess why theyÓre headed toward Hilo ? Go ahead, take a wild guess. <br />Cause they canÓt get a job in Puna, they canÓt get the services they need in Puna. We need that. <br />We needed it a decade ago. ItÓs real clear. <br />As to the Special Use Permits, the history on this special use permit -. Within a mile of this and <br />in recent times some of you may recall you approved a special use permit for the Water Works. <br />They have no access to Highway 130. TheyÓre actually within Hawaiian Paradise Park. You <br />approved a special use permit for Drain Pipe Plumbing and for tw <br />the same situation, you canÓt let them out on the highway. We all understand that. HeÓs not <br />asking for that. So this is not, this is not asking for anything that hasnÓt already been done and <br />been done recently. <br />I canÓt let this go without, you know, the issue of whether or not the General Plan supersedes the <br />CDPs. The CDP, our CDP was adopted by ordinance. It is a law. It is under County law. Now <br />the argument as to whether or not that law supersedes the General Plan law is going to be <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.