My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-06-05 TTHOMAS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-06-05 TTHOMAS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:28:17 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:28:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WOODWARD: If I might suggest, could we add a condition to this rezoning application <br />that says that this rezoning will only be for use as a self-storage facility? <br />GRAHAM: That’s a suggestion by Commissioner Woodward. Does that meet the <br />objections of anyone here that voted against this such that they feel that would be a productive <br />change to the motion? <br />TORIGOE: You should see if the Planning Director had a comment. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Mr.Yuen, do you have any comments on where we’re at right <br />now and what you might suggest? <br />YUEN: Well, where are we at with the 90-day timeframe? <br />DARROW: I believe it starts today. <br />YUEN: You have time to agendize this for another meeting. Yeah, we have a split <br />vote by the Commission, it’s not the end of the world. You can agendize it for another meeting <br />and see if with a larger group we can come up with a majority to recommend one way or another. <br />As far as the specific recommendation of the self-storage facility, I would ask first for the <br />applicant’s comments, and then I would make my own. But, you know, I mean that’s a major <br />condition, and I’d like to hear what the applicant has to say about that. Other than that, you <br />know, if the Commission does not have a majority at this meeting to vote one way or another <br />there’s a 90-day timeframe, and it would simply return to the Planning Commission’s agenda for <br />further consideration if we don’t have five votes to make a definitive recommendation to the <br />Council. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA: Thanks, Mr. Chair. As previous applicants in the past, if it doesn’t have a <br />majority vote it comes back anyway. So I’m okay in reagendizing it and see how it goes. <br />Because if we don’t reach a majority vote then it goes up anyways because of the timeline. So <br />I’m not in favor of, you know, singling out a condition just for the self-storage. So to me the <br />best option would be just to reagendize it and revisit it again at the next meeting. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. It seems like that’s where we’re headed. Mr. Thomas, I know this <br />was all a little maybe unexpected for you and we didn’t, -. <br />M. THOMAS: It’s not so much unexpected. I just had a question while you guys are here <br />if I’m going to come back in 90 days to maybe address some of those things -. <br />NOMURA: Microphone. <br />GRAHAM: All right. Wait please. Mr. Torigoe, would it be appropriate for <br />Mr. Thomas to make any comment now or, would that be all right? <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.