My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-06-05 TSUPERSTORES
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-06-05 TSUPERSTORES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:28:34 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:28:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would loved to have heard it from Mr. Torigoe cause he represents this Commission, not <br />Mr. Yuen. Mr. Yuen is an attorney but he doesn’t represent this Commission. And if Mr. <br />Torigoe agrees with Mr.Yuen’s assessment of the jurisdiction of the County that they have on <br />these lands, then I would entertain to all of you then why would this County need an MOA? <br />Why do they need an MOA with the Department of Hawaiian Home to say that their zoning does <br />apply or don’t apply. If you don’t have the right to it then you don’t belong. The Department of <br />Hawaiian Home has no business even to come in here and ask you. They have responsibilities to <br />the beneficiaries, and maybe, as Uncle Sam mentioned there’s about 5 or 7 of us who are <br />beneficiaries of the Act. So they have an obligation to the beneficiaries, not to the County of <br />Hawaii. And the reason I raise that question is just that. <br />When, in this case it was Waiakea Center who built the Wal-Mart in that area. When they got <br />the lease they had an obligation under the HRS because the public was going to use that place. It <br />was not built just for Hawaiians. It was for the public to use. So when they have an obligation <br />that the public was going to use the area or use Hawaiian Home lands then they have an <br />obligation to comply with everything that the County says needs to be put in place, everything. <br />That’s getting permits, that’s going through every zoning requirement. Whatever they needed to <br />do they needed to comply. But what has happened is they failed to or the County closed their <br />eyes and allowed it to happen without having to get a permit for grubbing or whatever they <br />needed, electrical and all of that. They didn’t need to do that. But the beneficiaries have got to <br />come before this. If I wanted to rezone some Hawaiian Home lands I’d have to come before <br />you, I’d have to get a zoning permit, I’d have to get a plan designed, I’ve got to go get a building <br />permit, electrical permit. As a beneficiary I’ve got to go do it. I believe you don’t have the right <br />to tell me that. But you do have a right to tell the Department of Hawaiian Home how they use <br />their lands when they invite the general public onto the land. The Act was set aside to make <br />lands available for us to use. We needed to be 50 percent the blood. I’m not going to dispute the <br />blood. That’s another great contention among us Hawaiians. But that’s what the Act was made <br />to do. Prince Kuhio set that aside, not to be used for Commercial. But when they bring <br />Commercial, I think you have all the rights to argue that; and this is the conflicting reports that <br />we’re getting as Hawaiians. When they say even if we have the ban it doesn’t apply on <br />Hawaiian Home’s. Even if we do have, it doesn’t apply on Hawaiian Home. I can go to the <br />Planning Department right now and put in a request to have my home, to build my home, and <br />they will hit it with a stamp that says “Not Applicable.” That’s all you need to do. Just go there. <br />They’ll stamp it “Not Applicable” because it’s on Hawaiian Home lands. They don’t do that if <br />Mr. Rodillas or somebody up in Kaumana did it. They don’t go in there where it says “Not <br />applicable.” But in this County the message is “Not Applicable.” So that’s what I need for all of <br />you to understand. I think the County has an obligation under HRS 171 to look at these lands. <br />I am opposed to this, excuse me, I’m opposed to the amendment that would allow big box stores. <br />So I’m in favor of the ban here. I would be against the creation of a specific area that you’re <br />talking because nothing in here addresses Hawaiian Home. So I think maybe you were right, <br />Commissioner Siracusa, about saying that we should go to Hawaiian Home to argue that. But <br />we can’t, we can’t go to Hawaiian Home when they come to you. They came to you. It’s <br />Hawaiian Home who’s going to continue to come to you because they have an MOA with you, <br />with this County. So I do say I’m against the ban here; and I’m against anything that would <br />create a new zoning on Hawaiian Home lands because you don’t have that authority to do that; <br /> EXHIBIT D 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.