My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-05 TSULLIVAN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-05 TSULLIVAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:45:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Okay, Mr. Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, then our responsibility and our task on this particular <br />application is to determine whether the application submitted at that time is appropriate or not, <br />well, incomplete or a complete one. That’s action we should be taking now, is that right? <br />WATANABE: Pretty much. It’s really, you know, in the end because of the way the rules <br />are stated, the way I understand it, the decision is really up to us now. It’s really in the, and we <br />are the final body that approves or disapproves an SMA Permit. Yeah, so, from a technical <br />standpoint, I think we could decide for whatever reasons, either which way. However, just to be <br />fair, I notice that Mr. Yuen has been taking some notes. So maybe I should provide you with <br />some time? You want to rebut on some of these? <br />YUEN: Well, I’d like to wait till – there are quite a few things I’d like to rebut, but <br />let me just confine myself to the last question. <br />WATANABE: The septic? <br />YUEN: No. The question about what is the Commission doing -. <br />WATANABE: Oh. <br />YUEN: What is the appropriate action for the Commission to take at the end of <br />this. And so let me try to give the possibilities for the Commission. Our recommendation is that <br />the Commission affirm that they need to do a certified shoreline, and then they can resubmit. <br />And then there’s a number of possibilities which would include that. For example, if they <br />presented a house site that was outside of the shoreline setback area, the Department could <br />approve the application with, as either an exempt action or as an SMA Minor Permit if it’s less <br />than a $120,000 in value. <br />The Director, if they build outside, sorry, if they can build without violating their shoreline <br />setbacks, the Director cannot actually deny a house. The only thing the Director can do at that <br />point, if the Director feels that the project has a substantial adverse environmental affect, the <br />Director can say that it should get a Major Permit and send it on to the, send it on to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />So, basically, at this level, our recommendation is that you simply return it to the Department, <br />require them to get a certified shoreline survey. And those are the things that would happen after <br />that. <br />On their side, I believe what they’re asking, the possibilities are to – the project could be <br />exempted because a single family home, single family dwelling, can be exempted. Normally, if <br />the Department exempts a single family dwelling from getting a SMA Major, from being <br />considered development and getting an SMA Major Permit, there are conditions that are placed <br />on the exemption. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.