My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-05 TSULLIVAN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-05 TSULLIVAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:45:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Yeah, that’s all it is. It’s a topo map. <br />BOWMAN: Okay. So, DLNR would have nothing to certify because they have to go <br />do the actual –? <br />WATANABE: Well, that’s kind of like what we saw today at the 3.2 tide. And that, <br />roughly speaking, one of the marks as you recall was under the right driver side of the red, I <br />forget what kind of car. <br />BOWMAN: Yes. <br />WATANABE: And it’s someplace around that 3.3 feet topo, so someplace in <br />approximately that area. So it’s within six inches of height, between three feet and 3.6 inches, <br />that’s where that high tide mark that we saw was. <br />SULLIVAN: May I clarify something on this? <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />SULLIVAN: Okay. The topo map was done August of 2007. After Mr. Yuen <br />suggested we get a shoreline survey, I contacted the – I’m going to go into this when I talk. But <br />thth <br />I do not know why it’s dated the 6, but it was done the 7 as the prelim for the shoreline survey. <br />And if Dan Berg did mark it 2006, then he messed up. <br />WATANABE: What was in there, yeah, okay, okay. But it does, okay, fine. We’ll just <br />keep that in the record. Okay. Yes, Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA Basically, this whole thing is revolving around the need or not the need for <br />a shoreline survey, if I understand correctly. So, I’m wondering, bottom line, how much does a <br />shoreline certification cost? How much are we talking about here? <br />SULLIVAN: A thousand dollars. <br />SIRACUSA: And if we have that information, and if it differs slightly from what we’re <br />assuming now is your shoreline, then that would, would that make any substantive changes in the <br />way that the Sullivans have to proceed in their building plans? Because what I’m thinking is if <br />it, if you’re going to do the thing with the pilings and everything and you’re setting it backed up <br />that much farther anyway and all of that, would that change at all, or are we just talking about <br />adding costing going through the –? I can understand the points that Mr. Yeh is making –and the <br />point that, which a lot of that legalees stuff to me is smoke and mirrors to divert us from the main <br />course of, you know, like how do we keep the shoreline protected. On the other end, a lot of the <br />Director’s legal comments are very similar on the other side. So my primary concern is the <br />protection of the area. And so I’m wondering would there basically, if there was just a slight <br />difference that doing a shoreline certification showed, and I would like to hear from both <br />Mr. Yuen and Mr. Yeh here, would that really substantially alter the development plans? <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.