Laserfiche WebLink
connected with ponds on the property then we would consider the ponds to be part, to be the arm <br />of the sea and the shoreline would be the edge of the pond. So we did probably, I don’t know the <br />exact number, 1, or 2 or 3 situations like that where we ended up approving houses based on this <br />private, this substitute for a shoreline certification. When we found out that in November 2006 <br />while this application was pending with us that the State would do a shoreline certification of the <br />property we did not want to continue doing this practice because it’s a variation from what the <br />rules call for. If the State will do a certified shoreline, if the State would do the certification then <br />we’re not going to accept a private survey, we’ll tell them go get the certification; and that’s <br />what happened here. <br />DOMINGO: Okay, so right now as it stands the applicant would need to have a private <br />certification? No need? <br />YUEN: No, what we’re saying, is -. We said, when we found this out, to go <br />through the normal process of getting a certified shoreline survey. The certification is actually <br />still done by the private surveyor but the State Surveyor oversees it and checks it. And when we <br />were doing it before, one of the Planning Department staff would go out with the private <br />surveyor to take a look and see what they were doing; but the State process, actually, we’re not <br />directly involved in at all. It’s still, the survey is still done by a private surveyor but the State’s <br />surveyor goes out and double checks the lines that are set. <br />DOMINGO: Is it the Planning Department’s, well, have they accepted the survey done <br />by the applicant with regards to the pools that they have in their property, and indicating by that <br />survey that it’s not tied in to the ocean? <br />YUEN: Well, I’m sorry, your question was have we accepted that? <br />DOMINGO: Yeah, I think they stated that. And the question is, I think, I was reading <br />something in here that it is normal or it is understandable that the ponds that exist above of the <br />road is in effect connected with the ocean level. But their survey indicates that it is not tied in <br />with the ocean. <br />YUEN: Well, if your question is do I think that that’s an honest survey done at the <br />time by the surveyor, yes. I would say, I’m not challenging that the surveyor accurately recorded <br />what he saw at a 2.8 high tide. We have a letter from the DLNR saying that when they do a <br />certified shoreline survey in this area they’d like to do it at slightly higher tide than that. So they <br />wouldn’t necessarily accept that map. But, again, you know, as I said if your question is simply <br />is this an honest depiction of what the surveyor found at that particular time, I have no reason to <br />challenge that. <br />DOMINGO: Okay, you know, the day those pictures were taken that showed, attached <br />to the -. <br />WOOODWARD: It’s December 2007. <br />DOMINGO: Yeah. Are there any other pictures taken with regards to the adjoining lots <br />and where the homes are built to show at what level -? <br />6 <br /> <br />