Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />HAYASHI:YouÓre not across 34 Street, are you? <br />HANOHANO:No. <br />HAYASHI:Okay. <br />KUBOTA:Oh, okay. As long weÓre accomplishing what weÓre setting <br />do. <br />SPRINGER:Mrs. Kubota, I think that there may have been confusion if she <br />th <br />described her property as having been on 34 Street, perhaps. <br />KUBOTA:Yes. <br />th <br />HAYASHI:I guess, basically, what it is is that 34 Street would extend here <br />and her property -. <br />KUBOTA:I have it, okay. <br />SPRINGER:Thanks, Norman. Mrs. Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:Yes. So now are we saying that the purpose of this construction to <br />be, is for security purposes and that we are not limiting them to be a specific type, the <br />Applicant to a specific kind of security fencing but weÓre leaving that aspect open? Are <br />we saying that? <br />SPRINGER:The condition, as I understand it, that is being proposed is silent on <br />the type of fencing; and that will be discussed between the Applicant and the Director at <br />the time of Plan Approval. <br />KUBOTA:So, do we, excuse me, may I cut in? <br />SPRINGER:Yes, maÓam. <br />KUBOTA:And I also in the motion, we talked about perimeter boundaries. <br />Would that suffice or do I need to say southeast, southwest, northern side of the, or tax <br />map key -? Do I need all of that information or can I just say security fencing along the <br />perimeter boundary of the project? <br />HAYASHI:We can identify by tax map key. And right now we donÓt <br />that tax map key identification, but we can include that in the letter that goes out that <br />would be signed by the Chair. <br />SPRINGER:Okay. And, members and Mr. Gadd, at this time weÓre still <br />discussing the possibility of inserting this new condition. It has not yet been brought to <br />15 <br /> <br />