Laserfiche WebLink
with some changes, or to deny it. And, so, you know, itÓs really not part of your official <br />action to really to amend the recommendation. <br />KUBOTA:No, at this point. Mr. Corp. Counsel, is there a better way to <br />handle on this? I just made the motion because it was asked for <br />my motion. <br />HAYASHI:Maybe the simplest way is to vote on the amended request and, <br />also, to add Condition 10. With that, if I may, at this point in time, and IÓll go over the <br />proposed, the conditions and the changes that the staff is recommending and, also, the <br />retention of existing conditions. So if you look at, starting from page 2 of the staffÓs <br />recommendation, No. 1 and 2 remains the same. <br />SPRINGER:Yes. <br />HAYASHI:Because the Applicant is requesting the addition of that one acre, <br />we are recommending a new Condition 3, which would basically state that these two <br />parcels will be consolidated. <br />Existing No. 3 becomes No. 4. <br />Existing No. 4, relating to the time extension that they had requested, becomes <br />Condition 5. And, basically, weÓre saying that the construction has to be completed by, <br />within four years from the effective date of this amendment. So that would take it to <br />1997, if this application, I mean, IÓm sorry, 2007, if this part <br />approved today. <br />No. 5 becomes No. 6. <br />No. 6 becomes No. 7. <br />No. 7 becomes No. 8. <br />No. 8, which is the hours of operation as well as the types of uses that would be allowed <br />under this particular permit, would become No. 9. <br />We would have a new No. 10, which would include the, which would be the security <br />fencing condition. <br />No. 9, existing No. 9 would become Condition No. 11. <br />Existing Condition No. 10 would be No. 12. <br />And No. 11 would be No. 13. <br />Are there any questions regarding the -? <br />18 <br /> <br />