2003-06-06 TWOOD - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HAYASHI:Would you like to come up and show us where your property is? SPRINGER:Since we have this question, can you come forward and please speak into the microphone. Sorry, I excused you. th HANOHANO:Okay. WeÓre on 34. So this is upside down, so we would be, this would be right on the, letÓs see, my property is here. ItÓll be, itÓll be to the right of me th on -. LetÓs see, this is Orchidland Drive, this is, okay, 34 is right here. Okay, this is upside down. Okay, so IÓm right here, so itÓs going to be right to the side of me. HAYASHI:Across the road? th HANOHANO:No, my, 34 runs this way, so my property is here. ItÓs going to run to the side of my property. So itÓll be on, we would have boundaries, weÓre sharing the same boundary. Does that make sense? SPRINGER:Thank you, Ms. Hanohano. Does that answer your questio Commissioner? THIBADEAU:Yes. KUBOTA:Madam Chair? SPRINGER:Commissioner Kubota? KUBOTA:I have a question about the TIAR. The summary for this area on page, well, I guess, itÓs the last page of the TIAR. SPRINGER:Yes? KUBOTA:In No. 4, on the summary and conclusions, it speaks to the analysis that determined that a traffic signal is warranted for existing conditions. Now, who is responsible, if it is warranted? ItÓs now not there. And this had to do with, they reported that this project had nothing to do with warranting the need for a traffic signal. ItÓs prior to this project that itÓs needed. Now, who is responsible for putting up something like that? SPRINGER:Thank you, Mrs. Kubota. Mr. Deputy? TAKEMOTO:This is a State highway. So unless the State or someone had imposed a condition on someone else to put up the traffic signal, any kind of remedy to existing situations would be the State Department of Transportation. And IÓm not aware of any actual impact fee or anything collected for the purposes of a traffic signal there. KUBOTA:So thereÓs nothing in progress is what youÓre saying actually? 9