My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-06 TPUNAcdp
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-06 TPUNAcdp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:02:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
discussion at the Kona meeting was about access to roads or the need to create new roads <br />for a subdivision of land that had not been subdivided. In Puna we have these 55,000 <br />lots, half of which are small lot subdivisions, one acre or less; and they exist and they <br />made no accommodations for services. Hawaiian Paradise Park some day 27,000, 30,000 <br />people are going to live on those almost 9,000 lots at least; and there’s not a place for a <br />gas station, a supermarket, an auto repair store, a hardware store, nothing. There was no <br />planning that went into this at all. And now we’re having to fix it and the process creates <br />winners and losers, which is always a bad thing. <br />WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Do we have any further questions for the -? <br />BOWMAN: I just -. <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />BOWMAN: I just have a comment. You said no planning at all. But, again, <br />going back to some of these community associations that put a lot of time and energy into <br />planning, I think that they address some of the issues, not all. But -. <br />OLSON: I mean, again, and that takes us back to this business of whether <br />this should be done by resolution or by ordinance. The Paradise Park Plan was adopted <br />by resolution, well, the revision was not. But, I mean, the original plan was adopted by <br />resolution. But, I mean, how much consideration has any of the previous planning <br />commissions given to that in handing out these special permits? Because it didn’t carry <br />the force of law and it was substantially ignored by previous Planning Commissions and <br />previous Administrations. So, yeah, they made the effort but the effort was ignored. And <br />the same thing will happen if we don’t get a document that is adopted by ordinance. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: You know with respect to that Light Industrial use, and we’re <br />looking at the Hawaiian Paradise Park Owners Association, I don’t think their plan was <br />totally ignored. With respect to that special permit, Jon, you noticed that there is a cluster <br />of special permits in one particular area, and that only happened because of the plan that <br />Hawaiian Paradise Park Owners Association came up with. So, you know, it’s something <br />that has some impact upon the decision that the Commission had made. <br />OLSON: But we also have a larger number of special permits scattered <br />throughout Puna and all of the subdivisions for all kinds of activities which creates a <br />helter-skelter, no planned whatsoever, way of spot zoning the particular uses, you know. <br />The special permit restricts it to that one activity, and it’s not a very good way to have a <br />community grow and try to develop. <br />DOMINGO: But you agree that because of that plan there has not been a helter- <br />skelter of special permits being awarded to individuals around and throughout the <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.