My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-06 TSUMIDA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-06 TSUMIDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:05:00 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:04:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
exceptions that had already been made, and if they could have it then why couldn’t these other <br />people. And it was really an apples and oranges thing. But it does, a lot of other people didn’t <br />realize it and they listened to that argument thinking that what she was talking about was <br />something fair, cause you’re not going to be coming out to the highway, and it’s a whole <br />different situation. But it still does give that impression when we approve something on the <br />makai side of 130; and then it’s very visible, you know, that, especially with these big steel <br />buildings that are way higher than the fence or that the plantings will be in maybe never <br />depending on the species they put in. So that’s why I’m so concerned, because it does give <br />other people the idea; and then we kept getting more permits, more permits; and instead of <br />planning by Planning, you know, a whole area, we’re doing it all on a piecemeal spot basis. And <br />I’m very unhappy with some of the other ones and wished that I hadn’t voted for them; and some <br />of them I didn’t vote for, so, even though they passed anyway. So I just wanted to share with <br />you that those are some of ideas that have been going through my head whenever I get another <br />application on the highway. <br />WATANABE: Ms. Siracusa, do you have a question? <br />SIRACUSA: No. <br />WATANABE: I thought we agreed that we would save position statements for <br />deliberation, that doesn’t count this time. <br />BOWMAN: I have a question. <br />WATANABE: Yes, Ms. Lani, I mean Lani Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: Special permits are given for a minimum of five years or can they be less? <br />WATANABE: Could be less. <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. <br />WATANABE: You have to keep in mind though, that there is an investment so, you <br />know, you don’t want a 90-day permit with a $500,000 investment. Along those lines though I <br />do have a question for the Director. I know we had a representative from Shipman here but <br />maybe the Director could respond to this. We did apparently allocate, you know, Industrial use. <br />You indicated it was Heavy Industrial in the Shipman area. But you should be familiar, I think, <br />with how much, you know, maybe acres we allocated and how much of it is actually used. And <br />the reason I’m bringing this up is also economics. Because if we require someone to put in all of <br />the extensive infrastructure and saying you’re designated as an Industrial area, and then we drive <br />everything away from that, I mean, how much Industrial area do we need? You know, I <br />understand that he wants the convenience but I think, you know, in planning you have to say, <br />well, this is how much we need and -. <br />YUEN: Actually Mr. Walter could give you a better answer. There is a very large <br />area in the Shipman Business Park that’s zoned MG. I think it’s something like 400 acres, of <br />which maybe a third or a fourth have been actually subdivided. So there’s a very large area that <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.