My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-17 DLNR 05-002
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-06-17 DLNR 05-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:17:19 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:17:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Could you tell me exactly how close is the closest point to the shoreline? <br />Well, you know approximately lets put it thatway? <br />NISHIMURA:Well, the closest point is that, the point jutting out in the, near the middle <br />of the property. And if you were to just scaleit off on that map its 50 feet. However to be <br />honest with you if you were to go on the site and if a certified shoreline survey were to be done <br />today I doubt that it would be that far. I mean its, its going to be closer than 50 feet. There is <br />however you know I would say there is sufficient land that, in front of the property that there will <br />always be an ability to traverse that area and to cross the entire width of the frontage of that <br />property on the remaining County land. <br />GALDONES:Any further discussion? Any further questions? Commissioner <br />Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Ihaveonemorequestionyouindicatedthattherewasapproximately4- <br />acres that was designated for public recreation that adjoins this parcel. <br />NISHIMURA:Yes. <br />WATANABE:Does that also front this beach that was referred to? <br />NISHIMURA:Yes. <br />WATANABE:And so- <br />NISHIMURA:It includes the beach. <br />WATANABE:Okay, thank you. <br />GALDONES:There being no further questions I do not have anyone from the public <br />signing up for, to testify on this subject matter. That being the case. Mr. Yuen in light of your <br />statement that you had made earlier is it still your recommendation that the Planning <br />Commission give it a favorable recommendation and forward to the County Council? <br />YUEN:Ill stick with the recommendation with the understanding that we can <br />look at this again at the SMA stage. On the question of balance I do appreciate the fact that the <br />State set aside the bulk of this parcel for long, permanent, at least long term for public recreation, <br />recreational use. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. Commissioners as indicated by the recommendation from the <br />Planning Director that the Planning Commission give it a favorable recommendation to the <br />County Council. Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA:I have one follow-up question. I guess my understanding is that the <br />request for this MCX including industrial use is based upon reference to the General Plan <br />designation in that area. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.