2005-06-17 HUGGETT SMA03-007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HAYASHI:Well basically were saying that this particular area has not historically been used for residential, recreational purposes although the area has been used for fishing purposes. There are other recreational areas in close proximity to the subject property and one of the area is that area by Kahului, I think its Kahului Landing, whichis further north of the subject property that we talked about not having an obstructed- having a unobstructed view from Alii Drive. GRAHAM:Yeah, so then again maybe similar to the first one I brought up then, the word as in the middle is not implying- HAYASHI:Yeah, you know that could be. GRAHAM:Cause or something like that. HAYASHI:Yeah. GRAHAM:Thank you. GALDONES:Further discussion, any questions of Norman Commissioners? Seeing nonemaywehavetheApplicantorhisrepresentativespleasecomeforward?Mr.Mooerslet me just swear you in. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the Hawai¡i County Planning Commission? MOOERS:I do. GALDONES:Mr. Mooers could you please state your name and your residence address for the record? MOOERS:My name is Greg Mooers. My address is Box 1101, Kamuela, Hawai¡i, 96743. GALDONES:Mr. Mooers you having heard the discussion, the background report is still the same but the recommendations have been revised. Do you have any-. First of all do you have copies of them and do you have any comments to them? MOOERS:Yes I do have copies. I do have a couple of comments Id like to address some of Mr. Grahams points. And then Id like an opportunity at the end to, I know there are people to testify today, to address any issues that may be raised. Just in summary I would point out that this is I think the 8th hearing on this project and the hearing is for Special Management Area Use Permit, its not a change of zone application. Regarding Mr. Grahams comments, the first one I think regarding the adverse impacts typically the issue I know when we do an analysis is always is the use consistent with adjoining properties. So in other words, would you be introducing a use thats inconsistent? And in this case since you have a 130-unit condo right next to this project the assumption was that the use would be consistent and it would not be detrimental. I understand thats a pretty wide ranging statement but that was used in the analysis. EXHIBIT A 4