My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-17 KAMIGAKI SPP1115
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-06-17 KAMIGAKI SPP1115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:19:05 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:19:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:Yes. <br />FUKE:Correct okay. <br />GALDONES:Norman this is all going to be encompassed in the new condition number <br />13? <br />HAYASHI:Yes. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. <br />FUKE:I think that again, just for the record I mean you know. The Applicant can <br />understand and appreciate such a requirement. The only thing I guess for the record we need to <br />note is that you know there are other establishments that uses, that uses, that use I guess Lotus <br />BlossomRoad.Andinadditiontothatthereareanumberofundevelopedlotsinthatareaand <br />so I guess we would respectfully request, at least we need to put on the record that you know the <br />TIAR as we see it would be specifically addressing the added impact created by this project and <br />the mitigation would be appropriately tailored to that and not be tailored towards like what may <br />eventually be envisioned for the whole area because there is always this notion of fair share. <br />GALDONES:Norman would that be the intent? <br />HAYASHI:Yes sir. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Since your project is encompassed within the bounds of, of that <br />subdivision Im wondering was notice sent to the Community Association and were there any <br />responses? Or have you entered into any discussion with the Board of the Community <br />Association? <br />FUKE:There was no special, separate discussion with the Hawaiian Ocean View <br />Community Association. Letters of notifications, letters of notification were sent to all property <br />owners within 500 feet and also including the roadway, which is partially owned by the <br />Association. But its my understanding theyre looking at the files whatever I received as well as <br />whats in the Planning Department file there were no letters of objection from the Association or <br />those who had received formal notification. <br />HAYASHI:If I may add to that. We did send the original amendment request to the <br />Hawai¡i Ocean View Committee Association for review and comment. We have not received <br />any comments back from them. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.