2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009

Home

SONG:Right, we have no objection to that. GALDONES:Commissioners are there any questions of Ms. Song or the representatives? Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA:I just wanted to comment that if were deleting Condition number 4 because since its already the law its redundant then all the other conditions after that have to be renumbered as a matter of housekeeping. GALDONES:Thats correct. Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Before Norman spoke to us about what the time requirements were on the original SMA 276 and I notice here on Condition 15 on the SMA permit we have an initial extensionoftimefortheperformanceofconditionsmaybegrantedbythePlanningDirectoretc. But when I look at the prior conditions I dont see any time conditions maybe Im missing something. SONG:Mr. Graham I think I can answer your question. Are you asking about the original SMA permit? GRAHAM:No Im asking about the current one. SONG:Oh. GALDONES:Norman will you be able to address that? GRAHAM:The question was where are the time conditions on the current one I dont see them in the conditions here. HAYASHI:Oh you mean the current SMA? GRAHAM:The current SMA. HAYASHI:SMA 276? GRAHAM:Not 276- HAYASHI:You mean the proposed? GRAHAM:Im asking the one that were acting on today the SMA 04-009. HAYASHI:I think we need to refer back to the proposed zone change conditions because some of the time conditions are required. If you notice Condition C of the zone change it says construction of the proposed development shall be completed within 5 years. So thats EXHIBIT E 11