My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:21:38 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:21:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
resulted in a greatly reduced density. Using the standards in the SMA law. Every, all the <br />conditions that we put on Kohanaiki are tied to things that are in the SMA law. We didnt say <br />build a public library or set aside a school site for example because there isnt anything in the <br />SMA law that tells us that those are things that you can attach as a SMA permit condition. So <br />the suggestion, if youre talking about zoned property and then somebody comes in for an SMA <br />permit theres a range of things that you can get them to do that are public benefits. You can <br />have, you can make them have a greater setback from the ocean because the public enjoys and <br />uses the shoreline. You can require public access, public parking places again because the SMA <br />law talks about public recreation but we cant say give us a million dollars. And, for some public <br />use or we cant say, give us a school site for example. On the rezone side for off site <br />improvements there is a County policy on fair share and its a set amount of money and we apply <br />that and I dont want to get into a situation where each- whereas each application for rezone <br />comes in we say, what community benefits can you provide and at some point were satisfied <br />and we say well support you and if were not satisfied then we wont. Then you just, you get <br />intoadhocdealmakingthatjust-itsveryhardtoapplyfairly,uniformlytoeverybodyinvolved. <br />So thats you know, Im trying to give you my stand on this concept of community benefits. The <br />site, you know this site happens to be where the logical, this logical connector road would be in <br />so weve put that in as a condition of approval of the rezoning. But the idea that we should have <br />some kind of free floating community benefit and negotiate that to the point where were <br />satisfied on a project by project basis I dont want to do that. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Mr. Chair I think. I think maybe we kind of got off path now so if <br />everybody, if its okay with the rest of the Commissioners Im ready to make a motion. <br />GALDONES:Motion is in order. <br />WATANABE:In the matter of KPC Villages LLC, Change of Zone Application, REZ 04- <br />033 I move to send a favorable recommendation to the County Council based on the <br />recommendations of the Planning Director. <br />GALDONES:Do I hear a second? <br />IWASHITA:Second. <br />GALDONES:It was moved by Commissioner Watanabe and seconded by Commissioner <br />Iwashita. KPC Villages, LLC, Change of Zone Application, REZ 04-033 be given a favorable <br />recommendation and then forwarded to the County Council along with the background report <br />and the recommendation. Further discussion? Hearing none, Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />EXHIBIT E <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.