My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:21:38 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:21:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:The eventual height is measured from the finished grade- the height of the <br />building. The disagreement in brief the disagreement between us and the Applicant is whether <br />you- they are proposing to bank essentially bank some land against one side of the building and <br />then measure it from that raised embankment. We disagree with that as a basis for measuring the <br />height of the building. <br />GALDONES:Any further questions? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:One more plan issue. In the new Hawai i County General Plan that just <br />came out in the land use element for North and South Kona. If I look in the Resort section since <br />were looking at a rezoning for resort here under courses of action it says a) discourage strip <br />resort development along Alii Drive. So that sounds a little contrary to what were doing here to <br />me. Do you see it differently? <br />YUEN:Iwouldsaythisis,thisjustbuildsontheexistingresortarea.Andits, <br />you know in the end youre back dealing with the fact that you have a piece of property thats <br />zoned for an RM building. That if you though were calling this its the resort zoning that <br />theyre getting enables them to have some commercial activity on the- to have a larger <br />commercial area on the ground level and slightly more units, multi-family units. So in essence <br />what youre doing, were allow- although its a V zone were simply allowing a slightly larger <br />multi-family building with some commercial. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Didnt you just say like a half, you know right before lunch or something <br />that essentially when you grant the zoning you grant all the rights within the zoning? Like when <br />we were talking about the Kawaihae project so that even though a particular project gets a <br />rezoning with a particular representation you were indicating that they have the full rights for the <br />rezoning. So theyd presumably have the full rights for the resort rezoning in the long term over <br />here also. Is that not right? <br />YUEN:Thats correct. But at this, this also is within the SMA. So they have a <br />SMA permit application for a residential building with some commercial so they would have to <br />conform to the specifics of the SMA permit. In other words if they, if for example they wanted <br />to convert this whole thing into a shopping center wed be, they still would have to come back <br />with the SMA. <br />GRAHAM:Right and we did go through that also earlier today about how the SMA <br />has a limited range in which we can apply our criteria correct? <br />YUEN:Right thats true. Its- my point was in describing in practical terms what <br />were doing here. As what we have before us is an RM zoned property thats likely to be <br />replaced by a similar building but with some commercial on the ground floor and a few more <br />units. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.