Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lively stated that the owner was not ready to decide which of the two <br />proposed roof materials choices would be used, due to cost considerations that <br />would be made after project fundraising is concluded. <br /> In regard to energy efficiency objectives taken into consideration in the proposed <br />design, Mr. Lively noted that radiant barriers were planned to underlay painted <br />roof surfaces, and that solar photovoltaic panels were planned to be installed on <br />the metal roofing between the Ðstanding ribsÑ of the sheeting. He stated a <br />willingness to study the aesthetic effect of a possible contrasting pattern created <br />by such paneling on the roof before completing the final roof design. <br />There were no statements from the public on this matter. <br />Commissioner Kitchens moved the Commission to recommend approval of the <br />application as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Power. In <br />discussion, a concern was raised about sufficient parking for the proposed facilities in a <br />locale where public parking is deficient. Rev. Faletoi, as a rep <br />landowner, came forward and stated that the buildings would not be used concurrently. <br />Planning Department staff explained to the commissioners that, based on the applicantÓs <br />commitment that the two buildings would never be used concurrently for different <br />events, the proposed parking would meet Zoning Code requirements once the applicantÓs <br />Ðshared parkingÑ commitment is approved by the Planning Director. <br />A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously. <br />3. KAILUA VILLAGE DESIGN COMMISSION Î Review and recommend changes to the <br />Rules of Procedure (ÐRulesÑ) of the Kailua Village Design Commission. <br />Commissioners and Planning Department staff reviewed previously proposed <br />amendments to the CommissionÓs Rules. Following discussion, Commissioner Kitchens <br />moved for approval of the draft Rules for presentation at a publ <br />by the Department. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Herbert. A roll call <br />vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously by the six commissioners present. <br />ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br />1. Approval of Minutes of the Meeting of April 27, 2010. <br />It was moved by Commissioner Burns, seconded by Commissioner Kitchens, that the <br />minutes be approved as circulated. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of <br />the six commissioners present. <br />ANNOUNCEMENTS <br />There were none. <br />3 <br /> <br />