Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii Police Commission <br /> Regular Session Minutes <br /> March 17, 2023 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Application for License to Carry Firearm Concealed/Unconcealed on their website there <br /> are two sentences in the second paragraph. The first sentence says, "The State- <br /> Certified or National Rifle Association Firearm Instructors are responsible for <br /> determining the course of fire to be performed by the applicant that will allow the <br /> Instructor to certify that the applicant is proficient in the handling and use of the firearm <br /> involved." He explained historically, from his understanding when the department first <br /> put this out as a guideline, only the first sentence existed. At some point, the second <br /> sentence was added which seems to go in a different direction. The second sentence <br /> says, "At the minimum, the proficiency course of fire conducted by Firearm Instructors <br /> should consist of the following, with a passing score of 75% or greater." The handgun <br /> qualification/proficiency course was provided because that's what they were doing at <br /> the time. They were asked for a suggestion, so they provided this, which was vetted by <br /> Corporation Counsel and was provided as a suggestion. He feels if it was a <br /> requirement, it would say "must" instead of "should." If you indicate it's a passing score <br /> of 75% or greater, to him, that liability is going to fall back on you, the individual state- <br /> certified NRA instructor. The law doesn't provide a minimum, this document is a <br /> recommendation. They also realize that they will not be potentially liable if a private <br /> citizen uses his firearm in some inappropriate way. The department has a different <br /> realm of responsibility. If you want to do something else and you as an instructor <br /> determines a different course of fire that allows you as an instructor to certify the <br /> person is proficient in handling the use of the firearm, it's up to you. This didn't just <br /> come from the Police Dept., guidance was provided by Corporation Counsel. This is a <br /> recommendation and what they suggest. <br /> Commissioner Sur stated going back to the original law, it was never "may" it was <br /> "should." The "should" in this should be "may." Chair Brown stated Corporation <br /> Counsel provided guidance to the department. If that was their intent, it would say "You <br /> shall." Commissioner Sur stated if you use the word "may" it's a lot looser. He further <br /> explained that he spoke to personnel and was told those are minimum standards and it <br /> needs to be followed. They're not saying what the chief is saying. He stated Maui's is <br /> straightforward, it's normal, but you're doing this "should and may thing." He suggested <br /> a change to the language, "should" be changed to "may" and he thinks it'll make it a lot <br /> looser. You throw the liability onto these guys. He also suggested that the chief provide <br /> written instructions to personnel because they're saying it needs to be followed. <br /> Chief Moszkowicz explained that as the chief, he signs applications. If you come to him <br /> with a packet that is not this but is signed off by a state-certified NRA instructor who <br /> says the person is certified and qualified, he will sign the application as long as <br /> everything else is correct. <br /> Commissioner Sur stated which means, as an instructor, you can follow Maui's <br /> guidelines. When the previous chief wouldn't give him an answer, he spoke to assistant <br /> chiefs in Maui and they heard HPD got the guidelines from Kauai, but no one will tell <br /> him who came up with it. Commanders he spoke to said that's what they shoot and <br />