Laserfiche WebLink
Applicant Presentation <br />Gayne Sogi of Whittle Signs introduced himself. He stated that the design came from the <br />corporate headquarters, and that their logo including its colors is nationally registered and <br />cannot be changed by law. He said that he did research work for them to make sure that <br />every other aspect of the sign meets the Sign Code. <br />Public Testimony <br />There was no one from the public wishing to testify on this agenda item. <br />Commission Discussion <br />In response to the Commissioners’ inquiry, Ms. Newlon said that there are no provisions <br />in the Sign Code that restrict the number of business names on one sign. Commissioner <br />Harris-Glade noted that having two separate signs would allow for more numbers of <br />colors and fonts. Commissioner Ross asked Mr. Sogi whether he informed his client that <br />no more than 3 colors on one sign are allowed; and Mr. Sogi said that he can’t recall <br />exactly, but if that is in the Sign Code, he believes he did. Ms. Newlon reminded the <br />Commission that those limitations are in the guidelines, but not in the Sign Code. She <br />added that the applicant is occupying two bays of the commercial complex. <br />In response to the Commissioners’ inquiry about the two businesses under one sign, Mr. <br />Sogi said that the order came from Rent-A-Center, and that his understanding is that Cash <br />AdvantEdge is a fairly new part of the Rent-A-Center operations. Commissioner Harris- <br />Glade noted that there is a separate door to each business, and they are not connected on <br />the inside. Commissioners discussed the possibility of splitting the sign into two, so that <br />the applicant would be able to use up to 3 colors for each sign. Mr. Mark reminded the <br />Commission that while the provisions of the Sign Code must be adhered to, the <br />guidelines are in essence a set of recommendations, which allows the Commission to use <br />its discretion. <br />In response to the Commissioner Coats’s inquiry about the proposed sign material in <br />relation to what is recommended, Mr. Sogi stated that he studied the area, and chose what <br />seemed compatible. <br />Commissioner Ogin mentioned that the appropriateness of sign size depends on the speed <br />and quality of the nearby traffic, and that the size of the proposed sign seems appropriate. <br />He added that the property owner is supportive of this sign. In response to Commissioner <br />Coats’s question, he said that to his knowledge this won’t be the only illuminated sign in <br />the building. <br />Commissioners discussed the applicability of the guidelines to the Old Industrial Area, <br />and Mr. Mark talked about the regulation differences between the Kailua Village Core <br />and the Kailua Industrial Subdivision; for example, much larger signs are allowed in the <br />Kailua Industrial Subdivision. Commissioner Ross mentioned that even though the size <br />of the proposed sign does not exceed the maximum limit, his concern is the appearance, <br />which is the subject of the Commission’s stewardship. <br />3 <br /> <br />