My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-02-12 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2008
>
2008-02-12 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:23:42 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:23:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NEW BUSINESS <br />2.Discussion of Sign Code Enforcement within the Kailua Village with Chris Domino and <br />others from the Department of Public Works, Building Division. <br />Commissioner Ross requested Mr. Domino to make suggestions to the Commissioners – <br />besides the various aspects of the matter he was about to address – from the standpoint of <br />the Commission’s goal that is to improve the overall appearance of the Kailua Village <br />Special District. <br />Chris Domino introduced himself and Dwayne Inouye. Mr. Domino stated that illegal <br />signs are a big concern of the Department of Public Works’ and the Department is trying <br />to handle the matter as best as it can. He mentioned that the current sign ordinance is <br />being revisited, as there may be some contradicting issues within the ordinance. He <br />presented to the Commission a brochure that the Department created in response to many <br />calls from the public regarding the interpretation of the Sign Code (the Code), which is <br />now available to the public at the front desk. He also stated that the economy has <br />changed significantly since the Code was written and it’s about the time to revise it, just <br />as the Building Code is revised approximately every three years. He noted that in most <br />cases business owners are responsible, rather than their contractors, to meet the Code for <br />their signs; but they are often unaware of the Code or if they are, they don’t follow it <br />because they want better exposure than the Code allows. He mentioned that the <br />Department currently has one violations inspector for the area between Kapaau and <br />Ocean View, who is also responsible for Building Code enforcement; and as far as Sign <br />Code enforcement is concerned, the inspector is presently enforcing signs that are in the <br />public right-of-way and are impeding public safety. He noted that the Department needs <br />to make the public more aware of the Code, and that the new brochure should help them <br />to do so. He said that they would also like to talk to sign makers who throw the total <br />responsibility on business owners, as well as property managers who throw the <br />responsibility on tenants. He suggested that the Commission partake in outreaching to <br />the community, not so much to enforce it, but to make them aware of the Code. He then <br />handed to the Commission the complaint form that the public is asked to fill out; he <br />explained that the form is used for all violations that are administered by the Department. <br />There was a discussion regarding the new brochure. Mr. Domino mentioned that the <br />brochure is the first publication and may be revised. The Commissioners made some <br />suggestions, which include on-line publication, a hyper link to the Code, more detailed <br />definitions and an explanation of the reference numbers used for each kind of signs; Mr. <br />Domino explained that those numbers refer to the definitions in the Code. In response to <br />the Commissioners’ inquiries, Mr. Domino said that the brochure is for a county-wide <br />use, and that one must research into the Code to get specifics for a particular area such as <br />the Kailua Village Special District. <br />In response to Chair Marone’s comment about a case where the applicant didn’t follow <br />his promise to the Commission that he will remove all illegal signs from the subject <br />property, Mr. Domino stated that it can create a legal issue for applicants to remove <br />something from a private property, and that in this particular case the Department <br />confirmed with the applicant that he was not contracted by the owner for the removal of <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.