Laserfiche WebLink
coverage; however, he said having too many trees around to hide the structure would <br />interfere with the transmission. <br />Commissioner Andreae noted that the photos in their submittal indicate the existing palm <br />trees somewhat distract from the towers, and mentioned she would like to encourage the <br />whole region be landscaped. In response to Commissioner Ross’s question as to who is <br />responsible to improve the landscape easement along Queen Kaahumanu Highway, <br />Mr. Mark said that it is generally the property owners’ responsibility. Commissioner <br />Andreae mentioned that it would be in keeping with what the Commission has done in <br />the past to approve with a recommendation that those poles be screened with additional <br />palm trees. Commissioner Ross suggested that a letter be sent to the property owner to <br />request improvement of the landscape easement strip in conjunction with the Highway <br />widening work; and thereby the Commission would create a reference point for any <br />future applications that may come before the Commission, involving the subject property. <br />Commissioner Andreae asked Mr. Turner whether the applicant would consider <br />purchasing a palm tree or two and plant them at their expense with the owner’s consent; <br />Mr. Turner responded positively. Commissioner Ross pointed out that planting the trees <br />would be better, easier and less expensive than maintaining the paint on the pole. <br />Mr. Turner noted that there isn’t space for the trees by the equipment; so they would have <br />to be planted along the Highway and the planting would have to be coordinated with the <br />Highway work. Commissioner Ross mentioned that the widening wouldn’t extend <br />beyond the existing retaining wall. <br />In response to Commissioner Au Hoy’s suggestion to approve the proposed additions <br />with a request to the landlord to enhance the landscaping on the site to help in reducing <br />visual impacts, Mr. Turner said that would be a reasonable condition, and that it wouldn’t <br />be the first time they had to put in some landscaping. He mentioned, however, they are <br />dealing with Crown Castle, and not the landlord. There was a discussion as to how the <br />recommendation can be best addressed in the letter to the applicant. It was confirmed <br />that the Commission doesn’t require the applicant to paint the monopole. <br />Commissioner Andreae raised a question about the flush-mount antennas Mr. Turner <br />mentioned earlier. Commissioner Ross said that once the additional palm trees are in, it <br />wouldn’t matter whether the antennas are extended or flush-mounted; he would rather <br />have the palm trees planted than impose the change. In response to Commissioner <br />Andreae’s inquiry, Mr. Turner said that the problem with a flush-mount system is the <br />capacity to handle rush hour because the capacity is reduced by having fewer antennas. <br />Commissioner Herbert said that the applicant shouldn’t have to make the sacrifice of <br />reducing the performance, since the pole is already unsightly and whether or not the <br />antennas are flush-mounted wouldn’t make much difference. He also pointed out that <br />although the palm trees would definitely help, the pole is still much higher than even <br />fully-grown palm trees; he added that you don’t get the same perspective as seen in the <br />photos submitted by the applicant when you are driving down the Highway. <br />Commissioner Ross raised a question whether it is important to have a landscape plan for <br />the easement strip developed by the property owner, so that the Commission can make <br />recommendations on future applications based on that plan.Commissioner Au Hoy <br />3 <br /> <br />