2011-03-08 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes

Home

also inquired about the proposed lighting, and Mr. Johnson explained that the dark blue building lighting was the franchise’s signature accent and would not illuminate the whole building, and that the parking area would have ornamental lighting fixtures that had been approved by the Commission in 2003. In response to Commissioner Burns’ questions, Mr. Johnson said that the proposed chain link fence would be painted black, and that with respect to drainage, their civil engineer was taking a careful look at the matter and there would be a series of drywells to control runoffs. It was moved by Commissioner Herbert, and seconded by Commissioner Kern, to recommend to the Planning Director the approval of the project as submitted. Commissioner Burns suggested that the motion be amended to include arecommendation that the applicant substitute the proposed cultured stone with a native stone material in keeping with the historical character and elements of Kailua Village. Commissioners Herbert and Kern agreed to the amendment. Mr. Childs answered Mr. Kim’s question, saying that the applicant would not have to come back to the Commission unless they were to make substantial changes to their plans. Aroll call vote was taken and the motion carried with four ayes (Herbert, Kern, Burns and Bleck) and three absent and excused (Coats, Power and Saito). 5. Kailua Village Design Commission – Consider revisions to Chapter 3, Article 2 -Kailua Village Signs, to forward to the Department of Public Works, Building Division. Mr. Mark said that he had been informed by the Department of Public Works that the Commission would be provided with proposed revisions shortly. The following were discussed: Variances from the Sign Code are a public health and safety issue and the County Council is not qualified to make such decisions, while they might consider the aspect of appearance. Recommendations provided to the County Council on variances should include input from Department of Public Works, Traffic Division. Granting of variances on visibility and size should be administered according to stated principles by the Department of Public Works Director rather than the County Council. The allowable size for logos should be re-examined by taking other factors, such as location and building size, into consideration. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Approval of Minutes of the Meetingsof January 11, 2011. It was moved by Commissioner Kern and seconded by Commissioner Burns that the minutes be approved as submitted. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in attendance. 4