2004-06-18 TFABYONIC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VITOUSEK:Yeah, I guess I would be interested in knowing if they, Im presuming the staff saved the envelope to see when the, it was postmarked -? OTOOLE:Are you checking, Norman? Norman, are you checking? HAYASHI:Im sorry, I stepped out. OTOOLE:Oh. Mr. Vitousekwants to know the Addario petition, was it mailed or brought in personally? HAYASHI:We dont have the envelope, but I believe it was mailed. It was th date-stamped in our office at one, a little after 1 p.m. on the 11. th VITOUSEK:On the 11? th HAYASHI:Imean, 14. th FUJIKAWA:On the 14. VITOUSEK:Well, you know, on behalf of the Applicant and with respect to that petition, I think thats a relevant concern of the Applicant. If it wasnt mailed until after th the 11, then its hardly timely. But, you know, what we dont want to do is create an issue that may complicate the Contested Case or any reviews, so we really will not take a position on that. Well defer it to the Commission in terms of the, accepting that petition. With respect to the petitions from Kimball, McGann, Hylton and Addario, they all live immediately, you know, in these new CPR units immediately across the street. They were, you know, developed over the last couple of years; and its hard to see why we need four, rather than, you know, I mean in terms of representing their interests. And the PlanningCommissionrulesdoprovidethatiftheyarenecessarilyduplicativethatyou dont want to complicate the process; and, so, again, thats a matter that we defer to the Commissionon.Imean,werenotgoingtoaskthatoneoranotherbedeniedstanding because we dont want to leave any issues. We want to go ahead and get this matter decided. But we would point that out. And were talking about four of these, I think theres eight units there; and we have four of the eight units in there all just these new oceanfront luxury CPRs; and theyve basically all the same interests. So with respect to the Puako, so, I mean, our position is, you know, we understand that they are nearby property owners, and the nearby property owners are entitled to standing. The only issue is whether we need all four. And then the next concern with respect the Puako Community Association, I thought I heard Mr. Momsen say that the Puako Community Association doesnt have any legal standing. I think he was referring to whether it was, what type of entity it was; and, so, that leaves me with some concern as to how, what this entity is, and how it makes decisions, and how it goes forward. And thats relevant in terms of how the Contested 10