My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-06-18 TFABYONIC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-06-18 TFABYONIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:50:01 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:49:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOMSEN:And Puako, as you all know, is a unique, historic and very diverse <br />community and has various issues come up before the community, our little community <br />association, regarding fire, fire breaks, flood, flood control, traffic, speed humps and <br />things like that. The remarkable thing is that no one in Puako can agree on anything, on <br />any of these issues. And this particular development, though, has been a galvanizing, has <br />had a galvanizing effect on the community of Puako and is the one issue in Puako that the <br />community has remarkable unanimity in being concerned about and opposed to. Weve <br />had a pole. <br />Ordinarily, to backup, ordinarily the Puako Community Association, as a volunteer <br />organization with no legal standing, tries to stay out of this kind of situation and just be a <br />conduit for information to and from the community about whats going on that might or <br />might not impact the various residents, and be neutral, and not take a position, and not <br />getting involved in anyone elses business. <br />But in this particular situation my phone and all of our phones have been ringing off the <br />hook.Wevegottenletters,someofwhichwepassedontoyouandsomeofwhichI <br />brought this evening, here this morning. <br />And we took a poll. And the poll has been, again, remarkably unanimous in terms of <br />being concerned about the density of the development, about the impacts on the reef, <br />about the treatment of wastewater, about traffic and the, as nearly as we can tell, the plan <br />for a narrower road than the Puako Road, which is already narrow in our view, and a <br />variety of situations, or a variety of concerns like that, like those. <br />So to summarize, I guess the, what Ive brought here, the reason that the Puako <br />Community Association has filed for this standing is that we discovered that this is <br />something that is a uniformed concern to all of the residents of Puako who have <br />responded to me and to us. And we wanted to take a formal stand as opposed to our <br />normal neutral position. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioners, any questions with the representative of the Puako <br />Community Association? Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Good morning. Is your association a voluntary membership <br />organization? <br />MCGANN:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:And do you have members who live in close proximity to this who <br />are not represented among those who have come forward? <br />MCGANN:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.