My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-06-18 TSMITH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-06-18 TSMITH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:50:09 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:50:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The reasons I have given for denial of this application in conjunction with my suggestion <br />that the approval be contingent on so many eventualities being resolved now, Ibelieve, is <br />enough to deny this application. I believe this Commission needs to accumulate some <br />hard facts before proceeding to approve this application. The window for good planning <br />decisions in this immediate vicinity will be open for only a shorttime; and, as a matter of <br />fact, approval of this single application as it is will close the door on a viable <br />infrastructure solution for the Government Road permanently. <br />I wanted to read all of that even though it appears that alot of those concerns have been <br />addressed, well, addressed in some form. But I think the eventual partofall these <br />possibilities is really what concerns us all. So I think thats the main thing to keep in <br />mind as far as this testimony goes, is that we need to assure that these kind of roadway <br />issues are resolved before these kinds of applications are approved. <br />Letssee.Iguessonequickcommentregardingthepreviousapplicationisthat,andI <br />dont believe that Mr. Smith knows this, but Mrs. Springer seems to be concerned about <br />native plants and Mr. Springer has a rather remarkable stand of native llama trees on his <br />property that is really unusual for the area, but I just wanted to mention that. <br />And as a direct concern to my property, which is located in a little different area, makai <br />of Mr. Smiths property, I have some concerns about the waterline issues. As you know, <br />all of our waterlines come down from the highway; and my waterline, in particular, goes <br />about twice as far as my neighbors waterlines go. So if a waterline is installed at the <br />Church of God Road Lot A junction, my waterline will still have to be run another, say, <br />750 feet makai of that area, so Ill still have, and a number of people below me will also <br />have waterline issues still. So, if water meters are installed at that point, we have some <br />concerns as far as whos going to be paying for those water meters, will there be future <br />issues with waterlines going makai down to my property and below me to the Kohanaiki <br />House Lots area that is at the end of the Government Road makai of all of this property? <br />So maybe we can look at some of those waterline issues at some point during this <br />testimony. Thank you very much. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any question of -. Springer? <br />SPRINGER:I was just wondering if, I dont have any questions for the testifier, <br />but I am wondering if the Director can respond to some of the concerns raised by the <br />testifier, in particular the philosophical and practical issues that were raised regarding <br />urbanization in its various forms. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions, Commissioners? If not, Paula, go ahead. Oh, <br />you have one? <br />YUEN:I think she was asking me a question about -. <br />FUJIKAWA:Oh, I see, Im sorry. <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.