2004-06-18 TWESTPRO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

We do have one typo I want to addressed. Its a minor typo on Condition P. At the end of the condition, it references this Condition R. Thats to be changed to this Condition P. In our changes of the condition that was overlooked. The Planning Director is recommending approval, mainly based on and a deletion of the, the approval is based on the hope that this project will alleviate some of the affordable housing crisis that we do have. Again, this is both the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and the Change of Zone, it is recommended for approval to the Planning Commission, to the County Council. Are there any questions? FUJIKAWA:Any questions, Commissioners, to the staff? Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Jeff, maybe you can answer to some or part of all what I got in mind,ormaybethePlanningDirectorcan-.First,aslookingatthe50-acreparcelof which is a park ten, this 10-acre park kind of looks like its a little island floating out there by itself. Is that the case or is it -? And do we have tentative plans for what the rest of the 40 acres are going to be? And, also, kind of thinking on that island sense, I noticed the Land Use Commission said that the project site is located adjacent to 2,610 acres of land that were reclassified from State Land Use Agricultural and Conservation to Urban, pursuant to a five-year boundary review. So I dont quite know where all those other lands are, and Im just trying to get a feel for whether were doing some little spot action out in the middle of somewhere thats, you know, not bounded by similar rezoned and classified parcels. Thank you. DARROW: If I can address your first question, in relation to where this area is on the property. Where the red dot is is basically where this particular part of the parcel is located. This would be the boundary line, the makai side as well as the south side of the boundary line; and thats located here. So it is on the back end, the makai southern boundary of the property. At this time, the entire parcel is within a, is in the subdivision process. They have received tentative approval for a 4-lot subdivision. As far as their intentions for the additional three lots, if I could defer that to the Applicants representative. In regards to your second question regarding the overall State Land Use layout of the surrounding properties, Im not particularly sure. This is a large parcel here. I would need to look at that, I could get back with you on that. Im pretty sure that there was quite a bit of area -. You have Kona Palisades thats State Land Use Urban. And if I do recall correctly, there was a large parcel, large area in this area that was zoned Urban; but I need to clarify that before I confirm it. HAYASHI:In response to your question, Commissioner Graham, the petition that was, the area that was reclassified as part of the five-year boundary review were the State lands. And those were the lands from, in this area, all of these lands here; and those were classified into the State Land Use Urban District. 3