Laserfiche WebLink
time, there is nothing that restricts either of those other two properties from being developed in <br />the future by a future owner. So I have a question about that. <br />GHALAMFARSA: May I respond to that? When I felt this was my home, I had created estate <br />for my family and I have instructed them to prepare the document and have that be recorded, that <br />this property, our home, this property can never be, perpetually restricted from being developed <br />as a resort. We thought maybe weÓll add one small room in back of the barbecue area because <br />itÓs only a very small house that has one bedroom. But I have that, and that weÓll record that this <br />property will never ever be developed as a resort property. ThatÓs my home. And I encourage <br />my neighbors to do the same. When I talk to Dan, I think they are going to talk about it. ThatÓs <br />how sincerely I am about, with the importance of this property, of this whole bay. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: So you wouldnÓt have objection, if the Planning Director were to initiate <br />downzoning of your two properties. <br />GHALAMFARSA: Absolutely not. I encourage you and plea that you would. <br />REINEMAN: I concur. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Okay. <br />HOUSEL: Commissioners, do you have any other questions to any of the testifiers? Okay. <br />Thank you very much for your testimony. We are going to start on the petitions for standing <br />now, so if you would all return to your seat. Actually, Mr. Reineman, if you would like to <br />remain, then we can save your trip back. <br />REINEMAN: Thank you. <br />HOUSEL: Could you once more, using the microphone, state your name and address? <br />REINEMAN: My name is Daniel Reineman. My address in Kona is 77-6296 AliÒi Drive and <br />my permanent address is 414 Sea Ridge Drive, La Jolla, Californi <br />HOUSEL: Would you like to explain why you petition for standing? <br />REINEMAN: For several reasons, we -. At this point would you lik <br />we qualify for standing, and how our interest is different from that of the general public, or -? <br />HOUSEL: Yes, please. <br />REINEMAN: Okay. We feel that our interest is different from that of the general public <br />because our property is contiguous on the north side of the proposed development, and therefore, <br />we stand to be impacted by it in a way that is distinct from someone that lives elsewhere. Is that <br />sufficient? <br />HOUSEL: And how do you believe your property will be impacted by this development? <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />