Laserfiche WebLink
GADD:So itÓs not going to be specified what type of fence? Perhaps a <br />rock wall might be more aesthetic or -. <br />SPRINGER:Just for a clarification, could we go over the specifics again of this <br />condition? <br />TAKEMOTO:Okay. I wasnÓt clear on the perimeter. So we would just put the <br />fence -? <br />GADD:But it would be preferable to have it at our option if we wanted to <br />go along two properties but, you know, weÓre willing to accommodate whatever the <br />committee feels. <br />TAKEMOTO:Say that again. <br />GADD:You didnÓt hear it? <br />TAKEMOTO:No. <br />GADD:It would be preferable to have the fence just along <br />Mrs. HanohanoÓs property. But if the Commission feels that itÓs preferable to have it <br />along both properties, itÓs acceptable. <br />SPRINGER:If I may, I think that having it around on the three boundary lines <br />that are shared with neighbors would be preferable. Because if it was just a single fence <br />along ÐaÑ property line, the testifierÓs concerns would not necessarily be met because <br />people could just go around that opened end of fencing. <br />GADD:I think thereÓs an intent to define the boundaries to some extent but <br />I just donÓt know what type of fencing we would like. So, you know, if weÓre being <br />asked to construct a certain type of fence, it might be better if we had the option to maybe <br />have a rock wall on one side and a chain link on the other. Or how would we distinguish <br />what type of fence to put? <br />HAYASHI:I think we can make that determination at the time of Plan <br />Approval review. <br />GADD:Okay. <br />SPRINGER:Is that acceptable, Mr. Gadd? <br />GADD:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:So, Commissioners, are there any questions about where we are so <br />far on this fencing condition? <br />13 <br /> <br />